<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
The first one is partnership
the second one is sole proprietorship
the third one is limited liability coporation
the fourth is coporation
56 people signed it and 43 painted signatures
<span>The correct answer is A:a growth in the steel industry. In order to build the railroad network, large amounts of steel were needed for the rails on the tracks. Steel was also a key component of the locomotives themselves. Thus, the expansion of this system required more steel to be produced and a growth of this industry.</span>