Raphaels well known fresco the school of athens in both its subject matter and harmonious arrangements summarizes teh ideals envisioned by the Renaissance popes.
<h3>What is
Renaissance popes?</h3>
Between the Western Schism and the Reformation, the papal history experienced the Renaissance Papacy. Western Christianity was largely free of schism and significant disputed papal claimants from the Council of Constance's election of Pope Martin V in 1417 to the Reformation in the 16th century.
Julius II was the greatest papal patron of the arts and one of the most powerful and influential popes of the Renaissance. His friendship with Michelangelo and his support of notable artists like Raphael and Bramante are what people will remember him for most.
Julius II was the greatest papal patron of the arts and one of the most powerful and influential popes of the Renaissance.
To know more about Renaissance popes follow the link:
brainly.com/question/879750
#SPJ4
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Free will." <span>An important difference between humanistic and psychoanalytic approaches is that humanistic psychologists believe in the importance of free will.</span>
Answer:
Monsoon forest, also called dry forest or tropical deciduous forest, open woodland in tropical areas that have a long dry season followed by a season of heavy rainfall. The trees in a monsoon forest usually shed their leaves during the dry season and come into leaf at the start of the rainy season.
Explanation:
Answer:
resistance
Explanation:
In psychology, resistance is the opposition and avoidance of helpful medical advice or treatment
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
