Answer:
World-systems analysis is a mode of analysis that aims to transcend the structures of knowledge inherited from the 19th century, especially the definition of capitalism, the divisions within the social sciences, and those between the social sciences and history
Explanation:
"World-system" refers to the inter-regional and transnational division of labor, which divides the world into core countries, semi-periphery countries, and the periphery countries. Core countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world focuses on low-skill, labor-intensive production and extraction of raw materials. This constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries. Nonetheless, the system has dynamic characteristics, in part as a result of revolutions in transport technology, and individual states can gain or lose their core (semi-periphery, periphery) status over time. This structure is unified by the division of labour. It is a world-economy rooted in a capitalist economy. For a time, certain countries become the world hegemon; during the last few centuries, as the world-system has extended geographically and intensified economically, this status has passed from the Netherlands, to the United Kingdom and (most recently) to the United States.
World-systems theory has been examined by many political theorists and sociologists to explain the reasons for the rise and fall of states, income inequality, social unrest, and imperialism.
Answer:
One specific historical similarity between the process of Spanish colonization in the Americas and the process of English colonization in North American was the role of the monarchs.
Explanation:
Both the Spanish and English colonization movements and exploration of the New World were state-sponsored, meaning that both the English and Spanish monarchs supported the trips and founding of foreign settlements because it allowed for new trade and crops which meant economic profitability.
Answer:
Federalists wanted a stronger central government. If Louisiana were to join the United States it would be likely that they were antifeds.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. principal of the school
Explanation: