Answer:
a. One difference in the arguments expressed in the two sources regarding the effect of the revolution on the global political order is the main idea of them. In the first source, it states, " the American and French revolutionaries expanded the whole horizon of the age, opening a path of linear progress, grounding social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality, lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens." Meaning, the main idea the "whole horizon of the age" While in the second source it states, "The French revolution and those in North and South America have been transformed into founding myths in their respective countries and are thought to mark the emergence of citizenship, of national economies, of the very idea of the nation. But in their own time, the revolutions’ lessons were inconclusive. . . . The revolutions of the Americas began by drawing on ideas of [liberty and citizenship] . . . to redefine sovereignty and power within imperial polities but ended up producing new states that shared world space with reconfigured empires." Showing that the main idea was the coming(emergence) together of citizenship.
b. One development from the period of the Atlantic revolutions that grounded "social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality" is the institution a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens.
c. One way in which empires in the nineteenth-century successfully resisted revolutionary change is the Ottoman Empire. Ottoman isolation was finally and definitively broken, setting the stage for the more significant reforms that transformed the empire during the remainder of the 19th century.
Explanation:
Answer:D
Explanation:
All laws must concern human behavior because for an art to be law it must be used and guarded by human
Answer:
A) a negative emotion or a negative state or arousal
Explanation:
In psychology, cognitive dissonance happens when a person holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values, or participates in an action that goes against one of these, either his believes, ideas or values, and experiences psychological stress because of that. According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent psychologically.
The discomfort is triggered by the person's belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein they try to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.
Feeling uncomfortable when one act in a way that is against his or her believe and hence stress themselves over the actions is cognitive dissonance.
Compared to developed nations, developing nations have low high per capita income and GDP.
<h3>What are the difference between
developed nations,
developing nations?</h3>
The countries that are facing the beginning of industrialization are been regarded the Developing Countries.
In conclusion the Developed Countries have low per capita income as well as GDP as compared to Developing Countries., hence Compared to developed nations, developing nations have low high per capita income and GDP.
Learn more about developing nations at:
brainly.com/question/1518893
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. Eliminating trade deficits
Explanation:
When a country with high number of highly advanced factories that produce cars lacks the source of rubber to make the wheel of the cars and then has to import rubber from other countries, this explains the factor of eliminating trade deficits as it encourages global trade.
Trade deficit is the amount by which the import of a country exceeds its export.
By eliminating trade deficit, the country ensures that their export is more than what they import.
