The purpose is to refute the counterclaim. Hope this helps. :P*
First of all, jargon aphasia is always related to damage in the temporal lobe (particularly, in the Wernicke's area).
Now, given that the interviewed's speech presents nonwords like "bick", "chpickters" or "carfter", it is most likely that they were dealing with a neologistic aphasia, this is, <u>no phonological relatedness to actual words </u>that would reach the meaning intended by the speaker, but would resemble, at least phonetically, to others contained within the linguistic community.
It would be C! the last thing that really happened would be romeo returning to verona however he didnt bring poison- resulting into him kissing the poison lff off juliets lils
Answer:
3
Explanation:
Subtext, by definition, refers to what one might call "reading between the lines". it's a deeper meaning behind the way a character may act or even the tone in which they speak.
