Answer: The correct answer is : I am not the man I was. I will not be the man I should have been ... Why show me this if I already overcome any hope? ”He added. "That? What happens when not? '', Said. '.' Please show me this? If I already surpassed every possibility? '' "What happens? '. Why? Why doesn't it show what has happened to me?'. Where do I show this if I have already left behind any illusion in my life? '" : "What's up? ''" ... "" Where to show me? If I have no hope anymore. ''. "What happens? '. What? Please?", "Why?" "No?" What happens? Yes, I don't have the opportunity to do it! '"Why show me this? I don't have hope anymore!'";.? Can't I tell myself? '. "Can't I be the man of my life? ...
Answer:
National level : President
State level : Governor
Local level : Mayor
Explanation:
The leader of the executive branch has the power to enforce the laws that created by the legislative branch.
President has the highest authority in enforcing laws that affected the whole nation (such forming relationships with other countries, Federal tax, etc)
The governor has the highest authority in enforcing the law that affected the state (such as state tax income, legalities of a certain product, etc)
The Mayor has the highest authority in enforcing law that affected the local (such as allocating budgets to build local infrastructures or education curriculum)
A significant increase in consumption and economic activity among a nation's consumers would decrease income inequality.
Option: A
Explanation:
A country's economy highly depends on consumer's behavior. If for certain reason the consumption and economic activity raises it will decrease the variation in income level. Strong economy promotes high purchasing capacity.
If the consumption level gets high more workers would be involved in economic activity which will strengthen nation's economy and Gross Domestic Production. On the other hand the unemployment will go down. Disparity in income level will also decreases due to high consumption rate and growth of economic activity.
The correct answer is letter A. <span>DeJonge v. Oregon was the case that established "clear and present danger" doctrine in terms of an individual's freedom of association. This was a case in the United States Supreme Court that the Constitution's 14th amendment applies to the freedom of assembly of its constituents.</span>
