It is a term used by biblical scholars meaning that it is used for religious reasons like pastors, christian or any other church religion except for the ones who pray to objects like the sun and statues
Blacks were the least group for aid.
Answer: Umm i got this from an an article and made it shorter
Explanation:
After the World War I, with millions washed away, people thought it was the end, but the break of World War II was even more worst than World War I. World War II or also known as the Second World War was fought between 1939 – 1945 in the Europe and Asia.
It was the worst of wars where more than 38 million people died and the most destructive war in the history of mankind. More than 50 nations took part in the war and it did change the world forever.
After the World War I, though the peace treaty was signed, this was the actual cause for another war. Germany was totally devastated from the war and it was then the Nazi Leader Hitler who took over and started his rule. It was the conquering of Europe by Hitler that eventually began the World War II from Europe. His invasion to Poland was the reason. Germany tried to conquer Britain but failed as they could not beat the Britain Royal Air force.
This was the largest armed battle in the history with the usage of deadly weapons, warplanes, battleships and first usage of nuclear bombs which took place. There was killing of innocent people in massive scale. By 1939, Germans troops invaded Poland and by 1941 the US also joined the war thereby taking the leadership too. By 1945, Germany surrendered thereby ending the war in Europe.
However the war in the Pacific did not end, until the US dropped two atomic bombs in Japan which was the most devastating action in history and by 1945 Japan also surrendered.
The after effects of this World War II is still being suffered by the people of Japan, even after decades has passed by. The World War II was one among the most destructive wars in the history of the world.
"From the mid-1970s there were new claims for the independent invention of iron smelting on central Niger and from 1994–1999 UNESCO funded an initiative "Les Routes du Fer en Afrique/The Iron Routes in Africa" to investigate the origins and spread of iron metallurgy in Africa. This funded both the conference on the early iron in Africa and the Mediterranean and a volume, published by UNESCO, that has generated much controversy because it included only authors sympathetic to the view that iron was independently invented in Africa. Two major reviews of the evidence were published in the mid-2000s. Both authors concluded that there were major technical flaws in each of the studies claiming the independent invention. Three major issues were identified. The first was whether the material dated by radiocarbon was insecure archaeological association with iron-working residues. (Many of the dates from Niger, for example, were on organic matter in potsherds that were lying on the ground surface together with iron objects). The second issue is the possible effect of "old carbon" - wood or charcoal much older than the time at which iron was smelted. This is a particular problem in Niger, where the charred stumps of ancient trees are a potential source of charcoal and have sometimes been misidentified as smelting furnaces. A third issue is the inherent lack of precision of the radiocarbon method itself in the range from 800 to 400 BC, which is attributable to the irregular production of radiocarbon in the upper atmosphere. Unfortunately, most radiocarbon dates for the initial spread of iron metallurgy in sub-Saharan Africa fall within this range."
507 years ago is the answer.