Answer:
The emergence of new daimyo coincided with the era of feudal wars. This circumstance alone allows saying that the military factor played an important role in their origin, left a significant imprint on the entire way of their socio-economic life and military-political activity. It is no accident that they received the name "daimyo of the era of feudal wars, or troubled times" (sengoku daimyo).
Nevertheless, it is unlikely that the military factor can be considered decisive in their origin. It would be more correct to think that military methods only ended the process, which had long matured in the bowels of Japanese feudal society and inevitably should have led to serious socio-economic and political shifts. The military situation in the 16th century introduced only the peculiarity that this process took mainly a military form, as if enclosed in a military shell. Therefore, the emergence of new daimyo should be considered primarily as a social phenomenon, reflecting profound changes in the system of feudal relations itself, which at the turn of the 15-16th centuries entered a period of crisis that affected essentially all aspects of Japanese society: its economy, politics, and ideology.
The emergence of new daimyo marked the decomposition of private land tenure and the formation of large feudal farms. At first, while laws were still in effect, according to which all land in the country was considered state property and was subject to periodic redistribution between farmers in strict accordance with the number of family members, estates mainly arose on the territory of the location of suburban villas that belonged to the metropolitan nobility (from here, in fact, the name "shoen" also comes from - literally " sitting down "). However, gradually, an increasing amount of land was withdrawn from the allotment system and turned into private estates, especially since the dominant forces were interested in this: the imperial court, the metropolitan aristocracy, churches and monasteries, which were the largest owners of the estates.
Explanation:
In this situation, Kevin's inheritence will goes to the person that written on his will. If he had no written will, then the next in lane would be his direct family.
Eventhough this happen rarely, some cases may exist when the deceased both do not write any will or possess any direct family. Under such situation, all of his assets will be given back directly to the states where he lived in.
<span>Christianity now
had the support of the government in its spread throughout the Roman
Empire.
The Roman Empire sometimes tried to use Christianity as a unifying
force. They succeeded in the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire which had
its capital at Constantinople and lasted until 1453, about a thousand
years longer than the Empire in the West.
hope this helps :)
</span>
Yes it's the same. they are just different terms but for the same event.