The answer is B. No.
The workers were not highly skilled but were prepared to work for lower wages and salaries. That's why people disliked them, because they felt that their jobs were being taken away by people who are willing to work for low wages and live in poverty just to earn something.
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
First red scary 1920:
- Its first red terror was indeed a panic that arose from nationalism after the war, the 1st World War.
- A substantial number of immigrants were expelled, suspected of becoming Communists.
- Extremely demonstrating (Seattle/Boston)
- Only after the public has relaxed, the very first red panic stopped.
Second red friction 1947:
- Just like the first Red Scare, a Second Cultural revolution occurred after the end of World War II.
- The MacCarthy
- Mccarthyism confronted the U.s. Army and CBS cornerstone Edward R. Murrow only at end of the Second Red Fear.
Answer:
The download does not open. Please upload again and I will answer for you. Thank you :)
Explanation:
There are numerous mountains in Japan and they were an obstacle towards unifying the country. Since many parts of Japan waged wars against others, it was difficult to fight in other people's regions since they had the mountains to their advantage so there was a difficulty in uniting every part of Japan through wars, like it was done in numerous other countries.
Answer:
Explanation:
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
