Most judges in the state of Texas are elected by registered voters and vacancies that may occur outside the normal electoral calendar are filled by someone appointed by the relevant elected officials. Vacancies at the county level for instance and the justice of the peace officer is filled by the appointment of the county commissioners court while at the municipal court vacancies are filled by people appointed by the governing body of the city or the mayor and the judicial vacancies at the supreme court level are filled by the appointment of the governor with advice from the Senate.
See, your question has some grammatical structure problems, but I think I know what you're asking for.
I will reword your question and answer it to the best of my abilities.
Anything that is about government affairs or how to run a nation is political.
What's about history, how people lived, or social matters is usually cultural.
<span>Which is cultural and which is political (assuming you're referring to those titles listed below)?:
</span><span>In the Navy: A Record of the Navy from 1775 to 1875-- Political
Sculptures of the Late Qing Dynasty-- Cultural
The Social Impact of Literature from the Age of Enlightenment-- Cultural
</span>
<span>Henry IV versus Pope Gregory VII: Who Could Appoint Church Officials?-- Political
The American Revolution: Growing Tensions Between America and Britain-- Political
The Influences of the Star Wars Movies on American Society-- Cultural </span><span>
</span>
Affirmative action was aimed at ending discrimination of minorities in various areas of society. This was accomplished through the creation of quotas for minority admissions or hiring. In turn, it was intended to give minorities opportunities in education and work as a way of ending discrimination
All highlighted examples show how Herbert Hoover (1874-1964) believed that once the federal government started to take directly participate in the economic system the inevitable outcome would be the loss of freedom.
In the first and second examples he is saying that once the government starts to take part, it goes all the way into the private lives of individuals which would be an attack against the basis of freedom.
Hoover thought like this because for him freedom only exists in the private life when it's kept away and separate from the government.
The third and fourth examples have the same meaning as the priors only now he is talking specifically about economics. He believed the problem of the Great Depression should be figured out by private businesses and the government should only cushion the situation.
The mandate of heaven is the thing that Chinese emperors claim was given to them by their deities. A ruler earns it from the previous emperor when he retires, or when he dies. It could be lost when another dynasty takes over and takes the mandate of heaven.
