They weren't so successful at conquering Europe or China. Of course, one can blame the long supply lines, but in these cases their adversaries were also determined to repulse them.
In contrast, Byzantium and Persia were exhausted from mutual warfare. Tribes related by kinship to Muslim Arabs had served as mercenaries during this period, so there was a lot of tactical knowledge available.
The Byzantines retreated to the highlands of Anatolia upon losing their lower-lying provinces to the Muslims. I am not sure if they launched a determined counter-attack. The Persians did, but they could not fight coherently.
Answer:
to identify the definition for “states’ rights
Explanation:
In my opinion it would be A
The economic differences between the <em>North</em> and the <em>South</em> led to conflict due to the South's reliance on <u>agriculture</u> led to their dependence on <u>slave labor.</u>
<h3>What is the conflict between the North and the South?</h3>
The economic differences were the major reason that initiated the Civil war between the North and South.
The Nothern regions were more into manufacturing activities while South was dependent on agriculture-related to cotton.
Therefore, the North experinced the industrial revolution but the South was still struggling with <em>slave labor</em> that <u>detorirated</u> their lifestyle.
Learn more about economic conflicts here:
brainly.com/question/9440615
I would say true. If the taxes were high it wouldn't allow investors to provide money for a new buisness
