1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alekssandra [29.7K]
3 years ago
9

The death of prithviraj chauhan led to the end of the Rajput rule in india. Justify this statement

History
1 answer:
Snowcat [4.5K]3 years ago
5 0

ANSWER: Prithviraj Chauhan was a Rajput Indian king of the Chauhan dynasty who ruled from 1178 to 1192 CE. He was a ruler of the present day states of Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana and Delhi of India. He achieved various military successes against several Hindu kingdoms. He also defeated Muhammad of Ghori who was a ruler of Islamic Ghurid Dynasty. The Muhammad of Ghori reverted back with an attack in 1192 CE with the second battle of Tarain where Prithviraj Chauhan was defeated and it laid the foundation of Islamic conquest in India.

You might be interested in
How did a drop in demand impact farmers in the 1920s
mash [69]

Answer:  Important industries struggled, farmers grew more crops and raised more livestock than they could sell at a profit. both consumers and farmers were going deeper into debt. Business went bankrupt and farmers lost their farms.

3 0
3 years ago
What was the impact of the Supreme Court ruling in Bush V Gore
nignag [31]

Answer:

The impact of the Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore was that the Supreme Court ended a recount in Florida that had stalled the election, therefore indirectly giving the win to George W. Bush.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How fortunate the government that the people they administer don’t think
N76 [4]
Umm I’m no expert or anything but I’m pretty sure that’s a quote.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Study the political cartoon. Which best describes the tone of this image?
yan [13]

<em>Your Answer: </em>

C.) Disapproving <u>because King Andrew the First (The man in the picture) is holding a slip of paper that reads "Veto".</u> I have also attached the picture for reference.

Hope this helps y'all :)

4 0
3 years ago
u can look up this question cause this one is not that important but put some words in ur own saying.......What is the differenc
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

Innocent: free from guilt; free from legal fault. This should not be confused with the term “not guilty.” Not guilty is a verdict by a judge or a jury that a person accused of a crime did not commit it or that there is not enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did loyalist want to remain part of the British empire
    14·1 answer
  • How did demobilization after World War I affect America's social climate?
    11·1 answer
  • What negative consequences could result from companies generating more products than they can sell?
    15·1 answer
  • After gaining power, what actions did Stalin take to secure it
    14·1 answer
  • Making one territory a part of another is called
    12·1 answer
  • Hi Chi Minh was the leader of the government of
    11·2 answers
  • Information page with ways that the North and South differed at that time in U.S. history (social,
    11·1 answer
  • Help me with this!!!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Question:It implements programs that support the goals of its natural development in the philippines.
    5·1 answer
  • Explain the role of citizens in North Korea. <br> Write your paragraph in this space.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!