The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The two arguments in favor of lighting for female suffrage in the mid-1800s would be these.
1.- Women are equal to men, so they deserve the same rights and obligations under the law.
2.- Women played an important role not only in the family but also were smart enough to be included in the business and social life.
The two arguments against female suffrage would be these.
1.- Many anti-suffragist of that time said that most women did not have the desire to vote.
2.- Unfortunately, some of those anti-suffragist believed that women did not have the expertise or intellect to be informed about politics. Some of the formed associations such as the Massachusetts Association Opposed to the Further Extension of Suffrage to Woman.
Fortunately, as we know, the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution granted American women the right to vote in August 18, 1920.
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.
The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]
Most likely there is. The most common example I can think of is in political circles. The goal is most often to create an echo chamber for their thoughts and opinions and keeping other ideas oppressed. Sectionalism exists in any group with a rigidly defined dogma, and closed thinking like that is still rampant in the modern United States of America. <span />
