How did james buchanan decide to handle south carolina’s secession?

1 answer:

3 0

Buchanan’s message to Congress also angered members of his own cabinet. On December 8, 1860, Howell Cobb, the secretary of the treasury, a native of Georgia, told Buchanan he could no longer work for him.

A week later, Buchanan’s Secretary of State, Lewis Cass, a native of Michigan, also resigned, but for a very different reason. Cass felt that Buchanan was not doing enough to prevent the secession of southern states.

You might be interested in

Explain why u.s. mail mail cars were connected to the pullman cars during the pullman strike.

iris [78.8K]

<span>The U.S mail cars were connected to the Pullman cars so they could allow federal intervention to end the strike by letting railroad executives to claim the strike interfered with the mail.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Louisiana

Feliz [49]

The correct answer is B.

Louisiana, also known as French Lousiana was an administrative district of the whole region controlled by France in North America, called New France. The name of the territory was decided in honour of King Louis XIV of France.

This territory was controlled by France but not really developed due to a lack of funding and human resources. After the French defeat in the Seven Years War, part of the territory of Lousiana was lost and transferred to the British winners.

<em>In fact, the names of those places abovementioned are clearly derived from the French language (for example, rouge= red in French, or the surname Delocroix which is French too). </em>

5 0

3 years ago

How the cases Miranda v. Arizona, and Gideon v. Wainwright helped the Civil Rights of the people?

ycow [4]

Miranda vs. Arizona = read rights before questioning

Gideon vs. Wainwright = anyone who can’t afford a lawyer will be provided one
Expanded individual rights

Hope it helps

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

O que significa, dentro da concepção grega, o verbete nomos?

Brilliant_brown [7]

I can help you if you can translate to English uk

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Refer to the passage.

Viktor [21]

Answer:

The inherent conflict between capitalist and communist economic policies, markets, and trade

Explanation:

Explained in passage, "During World War II, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union partially abandoned an approach to international relations which presupposed the inevitability of a clash between communism and capitalism. "

8 0

3 years ago