Answer:
A
Explanation:
because it is just A so get over it!!!!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
This is the report writing on the government announcement about the closure of all educational establishments across India on March 31.
The government of India issued an important statement on March 16 that impacted Indian society and the education system.
The government announced the closure of all educational establishments across India effective on March 31.
What was the reason?
The government of India located in New Dehli considered that this was the best measure at hand to prevent the spread of the pandemic in Indian society.
The Group of Ministers of India, led by Dr. Harsh Vardhan, opted for this action as one of the governmental actions to stop the spread of the virus, knowing that India has limited health services across the country, not all in the best operational conditions. The decision laid under the responsibility of the Wealth and Family Welfare Office.
Answer:
Dialogue shows what is happening instead of telling it. It portrays a scene vividly and breathes life into the characters. A good dialogue engages our attention very quickly as it lacks value judgments or lengthy explanations by the narrator
Answer:
SITUATION WANTED
We inform the presence of a young specialized executive with good references and recommendations looking to move to a prestigious export company in Mumbai / Bangalore. The young man has experience in business and people management, marketing and structuring of E-commerce. Desired salary: to be negotiated. Interested parties should contact Shirish Saxena, through the number: 0177-0923
Explanation:
The above announcement was made in the form of a "situation wanted" setting out basic statements about a boy who wants to be hired by a company of interest. The announcement exposes information about references, contact number and specialties of the young person, in order to draw the attention of possible interested in hiring him.
Your question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Ryan Tompkins located three excellent sources for his persuasive speech. He copied long sections from each source word for word, strung them together with a few transitions, and mentioned the sources of his information in passing. Which of the following statements best describes Ryan's situation?
a) Ryan is ethical because he did research for his speech.
b) Ryan is guilty of global plagiarism.
c) Ryan is guilty of patchwork plagiarism.
d) Ryan is ethical because he mentioned the sources of his information.
e) Ryan is guilty of incremental plagiarism.
Answer:
The best option is letter C) Ryan is guilty of patchwork plagiarism.
Explanation:
<u>When someone copies large portions of two or more sources and presents the result as their own work, we have a case of patchwork plagiarism. </u>Even though Ryan mentioned the sources of his information in passing, he did not make an effort to express himself with his own words and ideas. Ryan did not add anything of value. All he did was copy long sections from each source and connect them, very much like we do with pieces of cloth when doing patchwork. Instead of using the sources to corroborate and support his ideas, Ryan used them as if they were his own ideas.