Compare and contrast the "Knights of Labor" and the "American Federation of Labor"

History

1 answer:

Ulleksa [173]4 years ago

3 0

Well first off, the K.O.L had very ambitious goals. Among these goals:

-an eight-hour work day
-end child labor
-end the use of prison labor, which deprived other workers of jobs
-equal pay for women
-government ownership of railroads and telegraph lines
-land policy that benefited settlers instead of speculators
-a graduated income tax
 
Although the KOL initially opposed using strikes, they were common by the mid-1880s. The Knights won strikes against the Union Pacific Railroad in 1884 and the Wabash Railroad in 1885. But they failed to win the Missouri Pacific strike in 1886. That was the same year of the Haymarket Square Riot, during which a bomb exploded, killing several policemen.

Secondly, there was a man named Samuel Gompers who had observed the Knights of Labor struggling. He also knew that what workers wanted most were higher wages and improved working conditions. So, in 1886, Gompers met with leaders from the masons' union, the hat makers' union, and other craft unions to form the American Federation of Labor (AFL). Unlike the Knights of Labor, the American Federation of Labor did not seek to include unskilled workers. Gompers believed the union would have more power if it represented only skilled workers. It also used strikes to force improvements for workers.Gompers also recognized that support for the Knights of Labor had suffered because of the organization's radical ideas. As a result, the American Federation of Labor pursued a more moderate course. It provided strike relief, or support, to striking workers so they could continue to provide for their families. Successful strikes helped improve workers' wages and reduced the length of their workweek.By 1900, as the Knights were declining, Gompers' union had over 500,000 skilled tradespeople in its ranks. He was seen as the leader of labor, and until the Great Depression, the AFL was seen as the nation's most important labor organization. The AFL benefitted from Gompers' leadership and the realistic goals he set.

You might be interested in

Young men protested the draft by burning their ______.

ale4655 [162]

Answer:

draft cards. ....,......

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. Describe the location of Greek homeland (including Macedonia) before 334 BCE.

Dmitriy789 [7]

Got this from my History book: Ancient Greece, there has been no other area that was so spread out yet so successful. During this time, and still today, the different city-states and civilizations were far apart. Making sea travel dominant, there was not many places to farm so all food had to imported into the area. I hoped this helped you! c:

4 0

3 years ago

Why were the Mississippi River and New Orleans important to the United States?

leonid [27]

Answer:

The river was a major transportation route and it's the last port before gulf of Mexico. It terminates at new Orleans. Crucial for trade.

Explanation:

Also it's the country's second longest river and provides water for millions as well as supporting billion dollar shipping industry.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement correctly describes events related to the black death of the 14th century

vlabodo [156]

The plague strengthened the grip of feudal lords over peasant farmers describes an event related to the black death of the 14th century. Hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam

Maksim231197 [3]

Answer: Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests. So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them. As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime." Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion. Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR. That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death. Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism. Again as noted by The Churchill Project: "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire." As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers