Answer:
False
Explanation:
You must always recognize both the opposing party and the agreeing party.
The last answer option is correct. This option states that:
"You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though."
<h2>Why would this be the peer reviewer's suggestion?</h2>
- A peer reviewer is someone who will give suggestions.
- These suggestions aim to make the text more coherent, efficient, and meaningful.
- In this case, a peer reviewer will give suggestions and how to improve the text and will show the author what should be removed or added.
In the case of the text Jaime, the peer reviewer must show how he cannot infer about the life of another writer based on evidence from his personal life. However, this inference must be made through evidence from the writer's own life.
More information about reviews in the link:
brainly.com/question/20466874
Embracing literary, musical, theatrical, and visual arts, participants sought to reconceptualize “the Negro” apart from the white stereotypes<span> that had influenced black peoples’ relationship to their heritage and to each other. They also sought to break free of Victorian </span>moral<span> values and bourgeois shame about aspects of their lives that might, as seen by whites, reinforce racist beliefs. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:The Neoplatonist account of evil is also extremely important to Augustine. ... The Manicheans also believed that the human soul was of the same substance of God. ... Time is the subject of Book XI of the Confessions, in which Augustine ... for the truth, this idea will become central to what Augustine sees as the path to God.
