A speech uses emotional appeal
Explanation:
The question is incomplete as it does not have the options therefore it has been answered based on prior knowledge.
Waatji Pulyeri is a Dreamtime story which describes the relationship between the person and his land. It also shows the relationship between human beings and plants and animals.
In Waatji pulyeri, the birds cannot fly above certain feet teaches us a moral that no one should cheat and lie as that could lead to consequences. Also, each individual has their own unique qualities so should respect it.
This story although is not scientific but the story like this can each the value of ethics and moral to children like cheating and lying can lead to consequences.
The writer should focus on changing the following things when adapting a Shakespearean speech for a modern audience:
- Figurative words and phrases
- Unfamiliar or outdated words
- Unusual syntax
<h3>What is a Shakespearean speech?</h3>
Shakespearean speech is a speech that belongs to the time of Shakespeare. It involves different syntax and common vocabulary. The speech will be difficult to understand by the modern audience.
The writer, when adapting Shakespearean speech for the modern audience, should therefore focus on the understanding of the audience and hence change the figurative words and phrases, unfamiliar or outdated words, and unusual syntax to let the audience understand better.
Therefore the correct options are b, d, and e.
Learn more about Shakespearean speech here:
brainly.com/question/16369162
Answer: D. Both A and C
Explanation: When you use someone's idea or quotes without giving proper credit, without acknowledging or citing the original author; that is plagiarism. If you want to evade any accusations of Plagiarism, you must properly give citations of any wordings or ideas that are not your own by putting them in quotations as well as writing the name of the author and date of publication.
Option A cited the author but did not put the statement in quotation which translates that those statements are his own ideas but the reverse the case, resulting to plagiarism
In option B, the author was properly cited and the statements were in quotation and that is not Plagiarism.
Option C neither cited nor put the statement in quotation which also resulted in Plagiarism.
So both A and C are plagiarism.
