Hello. You did not inform the article to which this text refers, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To support the idea that a storm was the worst sight in all of America, the author must present information to support this argument. Therefore, the author must have shown meteorological data that show the intensity of the storm and compare it with other storms. In addition, the author must show the destructive power of the storm, presenting the damage it caused to the American population.
Answer:
Which statement explains the reasoning and evidence used to support the claim that a principality created by the people is easier to rule?
Explanation:
The claim that a principality created by the people is easier to govern is a conclusion of deductive thinking, where the author has used evidence to substantiate that claim. These evidences must have been taken from historical facts, which prove that the conclusion is correct. In other words, we can say that to generate this claim, the author used an argument that uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
Hope this was helpful
The answer to your question would be prohibited as it does mean to be forbidden or not allowed to and on this sentence is saying that since it was too noisy it was impossible to study.
