If checks and balances didn't exist, there would be nothing stopping a group i.e. the president, from making whatever laws they wanted.
In essence, if there are no checks and balances, government is no longer a democracy because nothing prevents the group in power from doing what they want. For example, a president that wasn't checked by the opposition party could pass a law saying that they are legally allowed to be president until they die, and nobody would stop them.
Dato maharajalela merupakan pemimpin yang mengetuai perjuangan menentang British di Perak, Beliau merancang dan membuat pakatan untuk membunuh James Wheller woodfird Birch, Residen British Perak
He was sent to lead 150 men into the mountains in search of silver and gold mines.
Answer:
Fact.
Explanation:
A proposition of fact is considered to be a statement in which the focus is primarily to make the audience (e.g arbitrator) believe in it as the truth of false.
In other words, a proposition of fact may deals basically on the existence or non existence, occurrence or non occurrence of something.
Hence, in this case, Since they were focusing on whether something did or did not happen, they were arguing a proposition of FACT.
Hello,
There were several different factors that allowed for the persecution and extermination of minority groups. For example: Hitlers feelings about these groups were expressed in the book he wrote and his speeches to the German people. Since he had absolute control over the government and military, he could have individuals he didn't like killed at any time he would like. Also keep in mind economic problems were the Jewish people. These posters and speeches were spread so often that people started to believe them. This allowed for the extermination and persecution of individuals in Germany, as average citizens saw nothing wrong with getting rid of these people who were causing the problems.
