Answer: (MAKE ME BRAINLIST PLEASE)
Meso-America and the Andes were the two habitats of progress in America.
Meso-American human advancements had paper and a pictorial content from a beginning phase.
In Meso-America the Maya human advancement gained the best ground in science and innovation. Among its advancements were the position-esteem number framework with nothing, the improvement of the most exact known calendar,the development of elastic and the corbelled curve.
The Aztec entered the locale as hero travelers and absorbed a large part of the current human advancements. They set up a government funded educational system and proceeded with the Maya convention of galactic perception.
In the Andean locale the Inca set up a domain that came to from Ecuador to Santiago de Chile.
The strength of the Inca domain was thoughtful designing (street and scaffold development), social administration and plant development.
The locale of the South Pacific isn't helpful for the improvement of civic establishments. Science in the South Pacific was confined to route across the high oceans, in which the islanders dominated.
The original purpose of The Federalist Papers was to persuade New York to ratify the Constitution.
The Federalist Papers were written and posted to urge New Yorkers to ratify the proposed usa constitution, which became drafted in Philadelphia in the summer time of 1787.
The Federalist Papers were written after the Constitutional convention for you to persuade American humans of the need of stronger federal authorities and aid the ratification of the constitution.
Learn more about Constitution here: brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
Answer:
He took land from patricians and gave it to the plebeians. He increased the size of the Senate to address financial issues. He grew the size of the military to provide more jobs. He created jobs in overseas Roman colonies for those in poverty.
Explanation:

The word "New Right" appeared during the 1964 presidential campaign of Barry Goldwater to designate "the emergence, in response to liberalism (in the American sense of the term [i.e. social liberalism]), of an uninhibited right: ultraconservative, imbued with religious values, openly populist, anti-egalitarian,