Education is shown as an essential factor of morality, sympathy, and harmony.
<h3>How is education shown as a theme in the book?</h3>
- The book shows that the education presented at school is very important for the academic growth of children, however, it is not enough.
- This is because school education is indifferent to social factors and the importance of empathy, sympathy, and social harmony.
This is because school education is indifferent to social factors and the importance of empathy, sympathy, and social harmony.
The book shows how an effective adult must have a strong academic education, but a strong social education, which is presented through conviviality and empathy between people.
You didn't show the chapters to which this question refers. This prevents me from being able to write a specific answer, but I hope the information above can help you.
More information about "To kill a mockingbird" at the link:
brainly.com/question/11985806
Answer:
<h3>this is not any questions please ask question clearly </h3>
As a writer, you need structure so that your stories will “hang together” and make sense.
Your readers need structure so that they can understand this story they’re reading, and feel something as a result.
I'm going to say C self similar because I don't think the answer is A broken and its not B tiny and D clone I don't think its right. So its C self similar
Answer:
The author means that now the tools are more important that the message itself.
Explanation:
The excerpt belongs to Small Change: Why the Revolution Won't Be Tweeted, an article written by Malcolm Gladwell, a Canadian journalist and writer. There, he discusses the impact of social media and other new tools in different movements across the world.
In this sentence, Gladwell means that the vehicle the message uses to travel is more important than the message itself. He uses as an example the case of Iran, where people got enough courage to uprise because of social media like Twitter. Even though it is an interesting idea, I don't totally agree with this. I think how the message travels is important, otherwise it could be really important but sterile. There's where the tools take more relevance; sometimes, due to different factors, the tools are faster and more efficient to use communication, but if the message is not relevant, then there are no good reasons to use the tools.