Who was William the Conqueror?

2 answers:

7 0

William was <span>he Duke of Normandy who invaded and took control of England in 1066. So C is the correct answer,</span>

Ilya [14]3 years ago

3 0

William the Conqueror was the "<span>C. Duke of Normandy who invaded and took control of England in 1066</span>" He was the the first Norman king of England.

You might be interested in

Analysis: Compare and contrast Washington’s advice in the three sections. How are his claims on unity, political parties, and al

Whitepunk [10]

This question is about "Washington’s Farewell Address"

Answer and Explanation:

Among the similarities, we can see that Washington urged the American people to stimulate the elements that allowed the country's growth and the social welfare of the population, at the same time that it urged the country to recognize and eliminate the elements that caused damage to the country. In this case, he states that it was necessary to encourage collaboration between the regions of the country and to discourage disputes, to discourage the formation of political factions and the formation of authoritarian parties and providers of abuses and to stimulate the creation of economic agreements with other countries, more to discourage the creating political agreements and staying away from European conflicts.

Different characteristics can also be seen in this speech. That's because Washington scored different points in the construction of the country. On the one hand, it reinforces the need for social collaboration and in the productive system, but does not forget to point out the political dangers facing an ascending nation. In addition, he did not forget to give his opinion on political alliances, international politics and economics.

6 0

3 years ago

Consider the arguments over the expansion of slavery made by both northerners and southerners in the aftermath of the U.S. Victo

Allushta [10]

The election of 1848 did nothing to quell the controversy over whether slavery would advance into the Mexican Cession. Some slaveholders, like President Taylor, considered the question a moot point because the lands acquired from Mexico were far too dry for growing cotton and therefore, they thought, no slaveholder would want to move there. Other southerners, however, argued that the question was not whether slaveholders would want to move to the lands of the Mexican Cession, but whether they could and still retain control of their slave property. Denying them the right to freely relocate with their lawful property was, they maintained, unfair and unconstitutional. Northerners argued, just as fervidly, that because Mexico had abolished slavery, no slaves currently lived in the Mexican Cession, and to introduce slavery there would extend it to a new territory, thus furthering the institution and giving the Slave Power more control over the United States. The strong current of antislavery sentiment—that is, the desire to protect white labor—only increased the opposition to the expansion of slavery into the West.

8 0

3 years ago

What was NOT true about the economy at the end of World War II

Readme [11.4K]

Hope this help glad to help