Answer:
C. The graph is always positive.
Explanation:
To solve this, it is basically a process of elimination. A is true since the -9 indicates the function was translated down 9 units, making the vertex lie on the y-axis. B is also true because if you look at the equation from 0 to infinity, the y-values increase. D is also correct because when you solve for the zeros, they do end up being 3 and -3, making the only claim that is not true C, the graph is always positive.
It's a bar graph. The scientific question would be how different male and female temperatures are from each other. The significance is debatable. Not very significant. That's all I can do.. sorry
Answer:
detective
Explanation:
if he was an officer he would likely wear a police uniform most of the time. if he was a sergeant he would be higher up the ranks and probably not be undercover doing things.
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
A budget is a<span> comprehensive plan of how one manages their money.</span>