Answer:
The free market can provide as much security as a statist system. ... There's no security at all when there is no economic progress and little wealth for anyone. Enemies of the free market argue that life without the welfare state would be radically insecure, an endless cycle of booms and busts.
Explanation:
The net effect of the supreme court decisions in McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden was establishing a strong precedent that unburdened future national policymaking from the restrictions of state prerogatives.
<h3>What is national policy?</h3>
- A comprehensive plan of action or set of guidelines adopted by the government on a national level to further national goals.
- Is a government document that outlines a comprehensive plan of action aimed at long-term sustainable country development.
<h3>What do you mean by strong president?</h3>
- A compelling future vision for the nation.
- A capacity to view their own era in the context of history.
- Strong communication abilities.
- The guts to follow an unpopular path.
- Skills at handling crises.
Learn more about national policy here:
brainly.com/question/13608554
#SPJ4
Answer:
Lesser included charges.
Explanation:
In criminal law, the term "lesser included charge" is a term used to refer to a crime that is included in a much greater crime. This means that a convict cannot commit a greater crime without committing a lesser one.
In this criminal case, all the elements needed to commit a crime are also found in a more serious crime. For instance, larceny is simply stealing someone's property with the intention of permanently taking it away from the owner. Similarly, robbery is also a different case of larceny except that it involves the use of force or intimidation on others. Thus, larceny is a lesser crime than robbery, but they all arise from the same incident.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
Answer:
there is not data on the questoin?
Explanation:
Answer:
I don't know
Explanation:
The correct answer isWhich of the following attributes is contrary to the use of fraud and lies toward personal advancement?
