This excerpt explains why the Articles of Confederation needed to be fixed or replaced with a different constitution. The excerpt goes over several different flaws in the Articles of Confederation including:
1) No national courts to solve issues between individuals from different states.
2) No consistency in laws- In other words, states got to interpret the laws whatever way they wanted.
3) No way to enforce court rulings from state to state.
These weaknesses, plus others, resulted in the need for a new constitution. The US Constitution replaces the Articles of Confederation and is still what we follow today.
Explanation:
Read the source given below and answer the questions that follow:(1X4=4)
In Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf led a military coup in October 1999. He
overthrew a democratically elected government and declared himself the ‘Chief
Executive’ of the country. Later he changed his designation to President and in
2002 held a referendum in the country that granted him a five-year extension.
Pakistani media, human rights organisations and democracy activists said that the
referendum was based on malpractices and fraud. In August 2002 he issued a
‘Legal Framework Order’ that amended the Constitution of Pakistan. According to
The massive turmoil that the Reformation<span> caused had a lasting </span>impact<span> on </span>European politics<span>. Soon after the Catholic Church deemed Martin Luther a “Protestant,” then </span>Europe <span>became divided along confessional, as well as territorial, lines. The </span>religious<span> turmoil of the period led to warfare within most states and between many.
Hoped this helped somehow</span>
The Contras fought against a group known as the Nicaragua.
There were mountains, barriers, and lots of water around to prevent invasion and disease
