1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
3 years ago
13

Which was the "overt act" that prompted the united states to enter the war?

History
1 answer:
ratelena [41]3 years ago
7 0
The sinking of the ship (the lusitania)
and the breaking of the Sussex pledge
You might be interested in
The following are historical events that affected the roles of women in society. Place each role in the order in which it occurr
kramer

Answer:

The percentage of women in the workforce steadily increased until about half of women worked at least part-time.

Many women returned to the home as housewives, although some worked part-time.

Women were encouraged to work in factories and offices to take the place of men at war.

The Equal Pay Act (EPA) mandated that men and women in the same job must be paid equally.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What’s the meaning of the Albany plan?
siniylev [52]

Answer:    

D

Explanation:

Started in 1754 when George Washington was sent to stop French expansion and Fort Duquesne

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John lives in a country where shouting no taxes could land him in jail. It is possible for John to be living in a democracy. Tru
Pepsi [2]
Answer should be true.

Hope it helped you.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify two reasons for the Indian partition.
iren [92.7K]
1. Congress leadership: Nehru and Gandhi underestimated Jinnah, Muslim League, its ambitions and outreach. In the 1920s, Gandhi neglected Jinnah and appealed to Muslims for a common cause, which seemed harmless at that time.In the 1930s, Nehru, assured of the backing of his socialist ideology and the support among the Muslim bases for the same, arrogantly believed that Muslims won't be moved by a party based on faith. It later turned out he was false.In the 1930s, Jinnah was willing to negotiate an agreement with the leadership, but was constantly ignored. This is going over my head. Arrogance and underestimation of someone doesn't go unpunished. However blame is to be equally shared by all the top leaders. In the 1940s, ML with almost a million members had no compulsion to bow out. He had no reason to cut a deal now. He was demanding recklessly. He refused to allow first independence , then partition. I may not comment on the course of history had this been allowed.While Gandhi tried his best possible to stop the painful separation, Nehru wasn't ready to the idea of Jinnah being the first Prime Minister of the independent India till the very end. Patel hoped partition would show Jinnah the fault in his ideas and would seal his fate. Thus the failure of Congress leadership and the rise of Jinnah is interlinked.
2. Jinnah and the Muslim League: He instigated religious passions and fears among the masses since the 30s.He was more concerned with the fact that Muslims and Hindus didn't intermarry or interdine and that Congress didn't have Muslim representatives in the 1946 Provincial Elections. He claimed in his 1940 Muslim League Presidential Address that cultures, literature and way of living and views on life were different of the two communities. The theory of one nation had been carried along too far and that it was nothing but a far fetched dream. I don't think partition gave too much peace either.The provinvcial elections were held on the lines of religion and demand for a new country, rather than on the promises of growth and "independence".Direct Action Day was a call by this great leader. What else do you expect from such a gathering at such a crucial point of time on such a critical issue. If countries could be made by gatherings and processions, I'm going out on the streets to demand the Shubham Kingdom! The violence, retaliation and counter violence led to the inevitable- Partition of two brothers, fighting for petty issues, not ready to listen and even the parents acting as stubborn kids.
4 0
3 years ago
What does this document tell you about life in the United States at the time it was written?
RSB [31]

Answer:

Base on the question, I would say that US wanted to group the Native American in communities so that the rest of the US could freely expands West ward, life was anti - Native American. I hope that you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have further clarification

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What ws an INDIRECT RUESUT of the crusades on Europe
    9·1 answer
  • In 1664, when new amsterdam's governor peter stuyvesant called on local residents to resist the four heavily armed ships of the
    11·2 answers
  • how were the bushido of the samurai and the code of chivalry of knights similar? a. they both emphasized religious quests. b. th
    13·2 answers
  • What was Martin Luther's profession?
    8·1 answer
  • Martin Luther and others attempts to fix church corruption became known as the*
    15·2 answers
  • How did the Taliban know whether people had TV's in their homes or not?
    5·1 answer
  • Kdo byl prvni Husita
    15·1 answer
  • Causes and effects King victor emmanuel III puts Mussolini in charge of the government
    10·1 answer
  • Q. Among all the three RTCs which one would you
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the Irish immigrants come to the U.S. in the early 1800s?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!