1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vekshin1
3 years ago
9

What was your original impression on Genghis Khan? What specific new information and evidence changed or reinforced your opinion

on Genghis Khan and the Mongols? How does the new information change the way you feel? How is an in-depth analysis of an empire and its legacy essential to studying history? What is your final conclusion on the Mongols? What’s your verdict on their legacy?
History
1 answer:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
6 0

Genghis Khan, originally named Temujin Borjigin, was born on the poor steppes of Mongolia in 1162. Being extremely poor and illiterate, still this man rose to become one of the greatest rulers and conquerors in human history. He came to power in Mongolia around 1206 when he was able to unify several nomadic tribes and transformed them into a political, social and especially military power. And because he had a great military mind, he was able to create one of the strongest and most powerful armies in the world.

What really stands out for me about Genghis Kan was that despite being so ruthless in his conquests, he was also a man who was open to new ideas and did not impose limits on knowledge, religion, art, or any other cultural aspect. He was always open to learning something new and as evidence of this, you see that throughout the time of his ruling, there was a spike of cultural and economical mixing that encompassed European cultures such as the one in Venice with the Chinese culture. When seeing images of Genghis Khan, you think about a rigid man incapable of any kind of intellectual capacity, aside from the military one, but you see that that was not the case.

Studying the legacy of an empire is vital to history because because it allows you not only to understand how the thought processes and behaviors of the time were like, but it also allows you to draw conclusions that teach new generations to repeat what must be repeated and correct what must be corrected.

The Mongols have always been portrayed as savages that came from a really unknown and unthought-of region of Asia and who literally swiped most of Asia and even parts of Europe to form one of the greatest and most powerful empires. However, what you learn after reading about the legacy of the Mongols and especially Genghis Khan, is that they were great military leaders, who believed in the system of rising to power and reknown through accomplishments rather than birth and this made their empire strong and long lasting. Also, the rise of culture and knowledge derived from the oppenness of the Mongols to trading and cultural exchange, was something that you would not have expected from a nation that supposedly rose from savage people. I believe that the legacy was really important and it shaped, especially Asia, for years after it ended.

You might be interested in
What type of warfare was taking place between Germany and France?
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Trench Warfare

7 0
3 years ago
A person’s value system is based on experience and what they were taught. Please select the best answer from the choices provide
solmaris [256]

Hello there Mr.Gamermatt1

Your answer is False beccasue a persons value system is based on how much they are worth and its kind of true but its false

Pls mark brainliest if i helped

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mark each statement if it describes a key characteristic of Athenian democracy.
QveST [7]
<span>"B.Paid juries of citizens heard legal cases and made decisions" and </span>"<span>C.
Power was in the hands of the people and all citizens were equal before the law" and "</span><span>D. Though all citizens were equal, only the wealthy and well-born were likely to serve as jurors or council members.</span>" are correct. But it should be clear that citizenship had a narrower definition than it does today.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ben Franklin's main contribution to the Constitutional Convention was to?
Dmitry [639]
Although Franklin<span> was eighty-one years old and in generally poor health, he participated as a delegate to the </span>Constitutional Convention<span> in Philadelphia with George Washington presiding. ... </span>Franklin<span> helped break the deadlock and pave the way for what became known as the "great compromise."</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Like the Egyptians the kushhitites
boyakko [2]

Answer:

Excuse me, is that a question?

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Olmec civilization’s use of slash -and-burn agriculture affect the environment ?
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the domino theory? A. Wars can be won only with multiple battlefield victories. B. If the United
    8·1 answer
  • Al-Qaeda’s main targets on September 11, 2001, were
    6·2 answers
  • Which describe political, social, or cultural changes that took place in Rome during the early empire?
    10·2 answers
  • Why is is important that the federal and state governments have separate as well as shared powers​
    10·2 answers
  • Does anyone know how to do this I'm stumped
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Do you think that Galileo Galilei discoveries changed society way of
    10·1 answer
  • Was martin luther diet of worms the official statement to support his theses
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT a cause of tension between the United States and Britain that would eventually lead to the War of
    14·1 answer
  • Why did tensions growbetween the United States and theSoviet Union after World War II
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!