1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vekshin1
3 years ago
9

What was your original impression on Genghis Khan? What specific new information and evidence changed or reinforced your opinion

on Genghis Khan and the Mongols? How does the new information change the way you feel? How is an in-depth analysis of an empire and its legacy essential to studying history? What is your final conclusion on the Mongols? What’s your verdict on their legacy?
History
1 answer:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
6 0

Genghis Khan, originally named Temujin Borjigin, was born on the poor steppes of Mongolia in 1162. Being extremely poor and illiterate, still this man rose to become one of the greatest rulers and conquerors in human history. He came to power in Mongolia around 1206 when he was able to unify several nomadic tribes and transformed them into a political, social and especially military power. And because he had a great military mind, he was able to create one of the strongest and most powerful armies in the world.

What really stands out for me about Genghis Kan was that despite being so ruthless in his conquests, he was also a man who was open to new ideas and did not impose limits on knowledge, religion, art, or any other cultural aspect. He was always open to learning something new and as evidence of this, you see that throughout the time of his ruling, there was a spike of cultural and economical mixing that encompassed European cultures such as the one in Venice with the Chinese culture. When seeing images of Genghis Khan, you think about a rigid man incapable of any kind of intellectual capacity, aside from the military one, but you see that that was not the case.

Studying the legacy of an empire is vital to history because because it allows you not only to understand how the thought processes and behaviors of the time were like, but it also allows you to draw conclusions that teach new generations to repeat what must be repeated and correct what must be corrected.

The Mongols have always been portrayed as savages that came from a really unknown and unthought-of region of Asia and who literally swiped most of Asia and even parts of Europe to form one of the greatest and most powerful empires. However, what you learn after reading about the legacy of the Mongols and especially Genghis Khan, is that they were great military leaders, who believed in the system of rising to power and reknown through accomplishments rather than birth and this made their empire strong and long lasting. Also, the rise of culture and knowledge derived from the oppenness of the Mongols to trading and cultural exchange, was something that you would not have expected from a nation that supposedly rose from savage people. I believe that the legacy was really important and it shaped, especially Asia, for years after it ended.

You might be interested in
What was the Ghana empire
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

The Ghana Empire properly known as Wagadou (Ghana being the title of its ruler), was a West African Empire located in the area of present-day southeastern Mauritania and western Mali.

5 0
3 years ago
World war 2 was caused, in part, by which of these factors?
Fudgin [204]
European appeasement of German aggression in an effort to avoid conflict is the answer
5 0
3 years ago
Which statement about race relations in the North and South after Reconstruction is true?
Ira Lisetskai [31]
<span>The answer is D.  Though blacks were treated equally in the North, the South continued to be segregated.  Despite the abolition of slavery, blacks were afforded the same opportunities as whites .  Many of them were also harassed by mobs of white raiders in order to keep them from voting as well assert their superiority over blacks.  Blacks couldn’t sit at the same table as whites nor could they dine at the same restaurants as whites.  It took another hundred years for blacks to finally be accepted in the South.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Building a bomb shelter in your back yard most demonstrates the
Harlamova29_29 [7]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "psychological impact of the Cold War." Building a bomb shelter in your back yard most demonstrates the <span>psychological impact of the Cold War </span>
7 0
3 years ago
2. Would a nativist have believed that immigrants could achieve acculturation? Why or<br> why not?
stellarik [79]
The cultural assimilation of Native Americans was an assimilation effort by the United States to transform Native American culture to European–American culture between the years of 1790 and 1920. ... It established Native American boarding schools which children were required to attend.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these was NOT a target of terrorists on 9/11?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the canal change the way people lived at that time it was invented?
    7·1 answer
  • This act limited the number of immigrants who could be admitted from any country to 2% of the number of people from that country
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPPP!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • What happened to all of Stalin's political opponents in his rise to power?
    9·1 answer
  • In a short paragraph, discuss the pros and cons of signing a free trade agreement. What are two benefits and two
    10·2 answers
  • What were his new teaching know as
    15·1 answer
  • In the Articles of Confederation what does “A firm league of Friendship” mean for the relationship between the states?
    9·1 answer
  • Review the map.
    9·2 answers
  • How many times was trujillo destroyed? once twice many times zero times
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!