The Romans brought the benefits of Roman civilization and culture to conquered territories,and thus assimilated their populations (at least,those that hadn't been killed or enslaved during the conquest) into the empire as a whole.
The purpose of this was to win conquered peoples over to the Roman way of life - a higher and more advanced standard of living would reconcile them to Roman rule.
Sometimes though there would be serious revolts against Roman rule - one in Britain and 2 in Judea were the most serious,so this policy didn't necessarily work everywhere all of the time.
MARK ME BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!!!!
If you want to live in Mexico you need a passport to get across
Answer:
This excerpt from document two connects to when the abolition of slavery was truly beginning to happen. Buchanan was a democrat who morally was against slavery but seemed to think the Constitution protected the rights of slave owners. " Should it be refused, then the Constitution, to which all the States are parties, will have been willfully violated by one portion of them in a provision essential to the domestic security and happiness of the remainder" . Buchanan states simply that if the southeners are refused their " rights " to have slaves then the peace that Anti and Pro slavery people, will no longer exist. I am meeting the essay's requirements for contextualization because I am quoting the context directly and using the context to help inform my audience.
Explanation:
This is what I wrote. It may not be right but I'm sure it is. You may want to read over it and edit it so it sounds like you wrote it.
