No, the Supreme Court should not have a police force with the power to enforce its decisions. This is for a couple of reasons: with the Supreme Court being the highest court and one of the three branches of government, it already has a large amount of power and does not need more, there are jobs such as parole officers to look over the actions of criminals after court and the police force is sufficient enough to tackle any problems as many problems as it can with criminality.
Because they both had to cross a border to get here........you may have to be more specific on the question for me to answer it
"Countries with a sphere of influence should maintain free access to their ports"
The money and goods a person owned
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Supreme Court voted 5-4 on this ruling overturning election spending restrictions dating back over 100 years.
It was always believed that the government was responsible for preventing corruption by restricting corporate and other group spending on elections.
This ruling written by Justice Anthony Kennedy states that "limiting 'independent political spending' from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech."