<em>Answer:</em>
<em>The two things He did was he affirmed the building of iron curtain by soviet and that the Europe would be against it.</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
In his Iron Curtain speech, Winston Churchill affirmed his wish to side with the United States against the Soviet Union and his belief that only the United States possessed nuclear weapons.
Winston Churchill used the Iron Curtain expression to refer to the border, not only physical but also ideological, that divided Europe into two blocks after World War II. Churchill popularized the term at a conference in the United States in 1946, when he said:
"From Stettin, in the Baltic, to Trieste, in the Adriatic, an Iron Curtain has fallen on the continent"
<em>The frontier of which Churchill spoke divided the socialist states, headed politically, economically and militarily by the Soviet Union, and the capitalist states, aligned with the United States.</em>
The French were infuriated at Jay’s Treaty•Instead of fighting France, Adams sent envoys to try to make peace with France•The envoys were met with bribes, but refused what would be called the XYZ affair•Adams was able to restrict fighting to the West Indies7.Describe the poisonous political atmosphere that produced the Alien and Sedition Acts andthe Kentucky and Virginia resolutions.•The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans despised each other, and theFederalist Congress wanted them out of the country•The Alien Laws made it legal to deport “dangerous” foreigners, most of them poorDemocratic Republicans•The Sedition Act made it illegal for someone to speak out against the government, adirect encroachment of the rights in the Bill of Rights•The reaction was the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions made it possible to nullifyCongressional decisions8.Describe the contrasting membership and principles of the Hamiltonian Federalists and theJeffersonian Republicans, and how they laid the foundations of the American political partysystem.•The Democratic-Republicans believed in states’ rights, a Franco-American Alliance,a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and the removal of the national bank•The Federalists supported Hamilton’s financial policies, favored loose interpretationof the Constitution, and enjoyed a more powerful federal government•This set the stage for the political parties’ arguments during the election of 1800
the answer for this question would be word
CONTENTS<span>PRINTCITE</span>
The 15th Amendment, granting African-American men the right to vote, was formally adopted into the U.S. Constitution on March 30, 1870. Passed by Congress the year before, the amendment reads: “the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” Despite the amendment, by the late 1870s, various discriminatory practices were used to prevent African Americans from exercising their right to vote, especially in the South. After decades of discrimination, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 aimed to overcome legal barriers at the state and local levels that denied blacks their right to vote under the 15th Amendment.
Answer:
Explanation:
La aritmética es brutalmente simple. Si menos de 100 personas controlan la misma cantidad de riqueza que los 3.500 millones más pobres del planeta, el resultado puede expresarse con una sola palabra: Desigualdad.
Y no se define únicamente por la brecha entre los que tienen más y los que tienen menos. También se evidencia en el acceso a agua potable, electricidad, saneamiento, educación, salud y otros servicios básicos.
La expansión de la economía a comienzos de este siglo ayudó a millones de personas a salir de la pobreza extrema. Y si bien América Latina registró las tasas más altas de crecimiento en su historia, la región sigue siendo la más desigual del mundo, según la Cepal.
La ONU y otras organizaciones internacionales se han propuesto el objetivo de acabar con la pobreza para 2030. Pero eso implica que cada año 50 millones de personas deberían comenzar a tener ingresos por encima de US$1,90 al día.
Es decir, cada semana aproximadamente 1 millón de personas tendrían que salir de la pobreza durante los próximos 15 años. ¿Es posible?
