1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitrij [34]
3 years ago
9

Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the united states confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be

essential to all written constitutions is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument. Which judicial principle does this passage from the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court ruling illustrate?
A) laws passed by Congress should be replaced if they harm U.S. citizens

B) the Supreme Court has authority over all other state and federal courts

C) U.S. courts have a duty to overturn any law that contradicts the constitution

D) Supreme Court justices must show judicial restraint when interpreting the Constitution
History
2 answers:
wlad13 [49]3 years ago
7 1

Answer:

C) U.S. courts have a duty to overturn any law that contradicts the constitution

Explanation:

Judicial review, is the act of reviewing a law, and see if it is constitutional, in Marbury v Madison Supreme Court, Marbury first instaured the figure of the Judicial Review, that puts the US courts in frontline of interpreting the constitution and new laws in order to see if they are constitutional. It was the first time that the Supreme Court declared an act of congress unconstitutional.

Mamont248 [21]3 years ago
4 1

Answer:

The answers is C).U.S. courts have a duty to overturn any law that contradicts the constitution

You might be interested in
What are the biggest strengths and weaknesses of the Japanese Empire?
bezimeni [28]

Answer:

Both Japan and Germany had a superiority complex. They think they are racially physically mentally culturally and militarily superior to others. It was there biggest negative as they were so much filled with their alter egos that they actually made foolish decision in war to satisfy their ego.

Both Japan and Germany were fighting war on multiple fronts. It was a strategic nightmare. Germany was fighting in Africa, Western front and Eastern front simultaneously. Japan was fighting in China, the Philippines Myanmar, Indonesia and Malaysia simultaneously.

Both Germany and Japan lack natural resources. The supply lines of raw material were in other countries.

Both Germany and Japanese governments were heavily influenced by corporate houses of their respective countries. In Japan, the Big 4 zaibatsu conglomerates had high impact in starting war by provocating military officials to attack Chinese position near Manchurian province. All the war machinary and items were sold by these companies to earn massive profits. Germany's corporate world also used their power to influence hitler to pursue his world domination as they were the main suppliers of nazi military .

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Complete the sentence. War erupted in Yugoslavia because the country was a_________.
Reil [10]
War erupted in Yugoslavia because the country was a <span>multinational state. T</span>he answer to your question is D.I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Because of the devastation of World War l, what best describes international attitudes toward Germany?
lutik1710 [3]
<span>The best answer for this question would definitely be: The ability of Western European countries to integrate their economies. The economy of Western European countries had been most flexible throughout the years. They have formidable systems that give balance of the percentage of finance.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the power structure of acient egypt ?
Serhud [2]

Answer:

The government of ancient Egypt was a theocratic monarchy as the king ruled by a mandate from the gods, initially was seen as an intermediary between human beings and the divine, and was supposed to represent the gods' will through the laws passed and policies approved

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What might have been the purpose of the walls in Great Zimbabwe?
iris [78.8K]
The walls are thought to have been a symbolic show of authority, designed to preserve the privacy of royal families and set them apart from and above commoners. It is also important to note that the walls surrounded and later adjoined huts made of daga (mud and thatch), linked with them to form a series of courtyards.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which influence is the most important to the american legal system
    12·1 answer
  • Which was true of the great awakening individuals
    14·1 answer
  • If you had been in the audience, how would you have responded to Henry’s speech?Why?
    14·1 answer
  • Why is humility important in political leaders?
    14·1 answer
  • Name the two states which touch the western border of olkahoma
    12·1 answer
  • The Columbian Exchange included all of the following except:
    8·1 answer
  • The cotton gin made cotton "king" and caused:
    13·2 answers
  • What was the basic cause for Truman firing MacArthur?
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP
    6·2 answers
  • A major achievement of Egyptian civilization was
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!