Answer:
They argued with the waiter because of some misunderstanding.
I'm afraid that I'm unable to help you. I don't have enough time.
We will never accept your unreasonable demand
You should go to this school because it has excellent reputation
Many soldiers heroes died in the resistance war.
Tan Son Nhat is an international airport. It should be larger in a near future.
She speaks with persuasion. This is the reason why that man trusted her
Our vacation was spent enjoying in a small village by the sea.
Alcohol advertisement is strictly prohibited in this country
You must familiarize yourself with the use of these modern machines.
Does your sister work as a sports editor for the Bang Da Plus ?
She said to me I would have to work harder next academic year
You should go to Seattle school of English. It's highly reputable.
Oh I go to music class in my school and I play violin so from me your answer would B
To refute means to prove wrong by argument or evidence. It also means to show something that is false, or that has an error.
Answer:
The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view, or opinion. The act of trying to persuade automatically implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued.
The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. In writing, however, an argument is very different. An argument is a reasoned opinion supported and explained by evidence. To argue in writing is to advance knowledge and ideas in a positive way. Written arguments often fail when they employ ranting rather than reasoning.
Most people have strong views on controversial topics (ones that inspire extreme points of view or opinions) and are often very willing to share those strong views. However, imagine you are having a discussion with someone who is only willing to share a particular point of view, ignoring yours, which may be in opposition. The ideas presented by that person would be very narrow, almost as if the person has tunnel vision and is merely expressing a personal opinion. If that person does provide you with facts, they may often be skewed or not from a credible source. After the discussion, there is only a slight chance you would be convinced of the other person’s point of view. You may have new ideas you had not considered before or a new perspective, but you would probably not be thoroughly convinced because that person has not made any attempt to present a well-rounded, fact-based point of view. This is why it is essential for you to not only provide your reader with strong, substantiated evidenced, but also to ensure you present an argument that looks at the topic
Huh? Is this a type of riddle lol?
