1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRissso [65]
3 years ago
12

PLEASE ANSWER under which circumstances might a u.s. president send federal soldiers to enforce order in a state?

History
2 answers:
ohaa [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Its either A or D. I would say D though.

Nitella [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Option (D). If a state police force could not keep the peace

Explanation: The United State of America President can send federal soldiers to enforce order in a state if the state police could not keep the peace. In case of emergency like a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, any attack on the United State territory, or other conditions, the president can send federal troops to contain the situation.

You might be interested in
The definition of the key term despotism:
Goshia [24]
Despotism means the excersize of absolute power especially in a cruel or opressive way.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Maya Angelou’s poem “Caged Bird,” what does the cage represent?
Zolol [24]

Answer the restrictions of society

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How was the free enterprise system different from mercantilism for 18th- and 19th-century Europeans? A.Under free enterprise, a
Alenkasestr [34]
"<span>C.Under free enterprise, merchants were able to conduct unrestricted international trade. Under mercantilism, international trade was restricted" is the best option, but there were other differences as well. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Impossible Questions #1:
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

George washington

Explanation

4 0
3 years ago
Why did the two major regional versions of christianity part? how significant was the split?
Goshia [24]
<span>Doctrinally, the split between the division of Christianity had to do with the nature of the deity. As a matter of historical causation, however, it is difficult to overlook the fact that the split in Christianity mirrored the concomitant division of the Roman Empire into Eastern and Western halves. As the halves of the empire grew further apart militarily and economically, so too did they grow further apart culturally and religiously.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is an impost block?
    5·2 answers
  • What did people began to call the shantytowns during the great depression?​
    11·1 answer
  • What was 19th-century reformer Dorothea Dix famous for?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the 12th amendment to the US Constitution
    14·1 answer
  • Who was usually responsible for making sure field work was completed by enslaved workers on plantations
    11·2 answers
  • In what ways is islam a way of life as well as a set of beliefs? (five sentences)
    11·1 answer
  • Which best describes a total war?
    11·1 answer
  • *<br> The Senate acts as a jury in an impeachment trial.<br> true or false
    5·2 answers
  • What is someone who authorizes another to act as agent?
    7·1 answer
  • Before 1858, the British controlled India through the
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!