How were the consumer protection movement and the environment movement similar?

History

1 answer:

meriva3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Both are organized social movements that seek to protect or conserve consumers and the environment respectively.

Explanation

The Consumer Movement is an effort to promote consumer protection through an organized social movement which is in many places led by consumer organizations.

The Environmental Movement, also including conservation and green politics, is a diverse scientific, social, and political movement for addressing environmental issues.

You might be interested in

Why does Clay list all of the different people who will benefit from the American System?

Zolol [24]

Answer:

A) To show that his plan will help all Americans

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Did Truman make the right decision in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan? Why or <br> why not?

Basile [38]

Many say that Truman was justified in dropping the first bomb and it kept a land invasion of Japan from occurring but that he didn't give the Japanese enough time to surrender and that the second bomb was ethically problematic.

4 0

3 years ago

Early farmers included the

arlik [135]

Aztecs,Ancient Egyptian's and SOME Native American's

5 0

4 years ago

How do the Northern Plains remain fertile for farming? A. artificial fertilizer B. deep landfills C. yearly flooding D. nearby f

wlad13 [49]

The answer is c. yearly flooding I've done the test

7 0

3 years ago

Describe the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Why had the Articles been written that way? How did these weaknesses a

xenn [34]

The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was known for being very weak and giving little to no power to the federal government.

The Articles of Confederation was ratified in 1781 and was the first constitution for the United States. It was written to be very weak, as this was written soon after the American Revolution and many Americans were scared of power being abused, like with what happened with Great Britain. With the Articles, the government could not tax the states directly, create and enforce laws properly, draft soldiers, regulate trade, amend the Articles without the approval of all of the states, and other important matters that needed to be handled.

The Anti-Federalists approved of the Articles of Confederation, they associated the government having power with British tyranny and wanted to keep the power to the people. On the other hand, the Federalists wanted to change the Articles of Confederation and felt as if it was doing more harm than good, they wanted to have a stronger government.

Eventually, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called to amend the Articles of Confederation. Many people were realizing how it was harming the United States and the Federalists became a big impact on changing it. Instead of changing it though, it ended up getting scrapped completely. They replaced the Articles of Confederation and made the United States Constitution instead, which granted power to the federal government.

The weaknesses affected many future policies of the United States. Thanks to the Anti-Federalists and their concerns about the government abusing power, along with the weaknesses of the Articles, there are many policies and regulations for the United States government. Policies also exist to protect citizen's rights and making sure they have power as well. Many of this has to do with the Bill of Rights, which protects the citizen's rights and was pushed for by the Anti-Federalists.

7 0

3 years ago