Josh watched television all day yesterday. Is the correct answer, hope this helps.
Answer:If the story were told from John's perspective, it would be a much more detached view of the narrator's descent into madness. Although the readers do not know what John thinks, it is clear that he believes that the medical treatment is correct. Not only would his perspective add another dimension to the woman's madness, but it would make him a more sympathetic character and perhaps even make their love story more tragic.
Who does Gilman ultimately blame for the narrator's descent into madness? Why?
In some ways, Gilman can seem to blame both John and S. Weir Mitchell for the narrator's ultimate insanity. Although they both mean well, their decision to promote the "rest cure" treatment is certainly the catalyst for the narrator's mental break. However, at the same time, Gilman could blame the society of the time, a society that expected women to be perfect wives and mothers and nothing else.
What is the significance of the first-person perspective of the narrative?
The first-person perspective of the narrative is very important because it allows the reader to understand and experience the narrator's descent into madness on a personal level. Instead of discovering the narrator's insanity from the detached perspective of a third-person narrator, the reader is present in the narrator's head at every stage of her insanity. As a result, the story is much more powerful and ultimately more disconcerting.
Explanation:
I don't really know why this would be a question related to school but either way I need to be taking this class.
Nowadays, the word <em>swag </em>is sort of synonymous with the word <em>cool</em>. People didn't really start using it in that way until around 2003, and when it became a definitive Thing in 2010.
Prior to this, however, the word <em>swag</em> was just used as a way to describe how someone walks. No, literally; the earliest recordings of the word came from William Shakespeare in <em>a Midsummer Night's Dream</em>. The official definition around the late sixteenth century was "to strut in a defiant or insolent manner," or sometimes as ways to describe how inept that a person was.
Strangely, its meaning got somehow lost a little while back, with a lot of people wondering where exactly this word came from since, surely, the creator of it wasn't Jay-Z or Will.i.am, right?
Dig more into it if you actually want to know. Simply, it was just how a person presented themselves; not that different to how it's used now.
Alright, I’ll help.
(Each of these are in order)
The one you answered is right.
The ingredients are put into the bamboo tube
The bamboo tubes are lined with banana leaves
Satay is served in street-side restaurants in tents.
The skewers of meat are grilled over charcoal or wood fires
Angklungs are made with two to four bamboo tubes
Angklungs are sold in craft shops
Bamboo is harvested for Angklung for over two weeks in a year.
Angklung is played at religious events
It is sometimes called sasando
Sanguana created the sasando
The sasando is played by picking at its strings
Palm leaves are weaved and attached to each end of the bamboo tube.
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!!
Answer:
D. The president can't make up his mind about running for reelection
Explanation: