Hello,
Here is your answer:
The proper answer to this question is "neither genuinely enlightened nor truly absolute". That's because enlighten absolutism is another form of Monarch and a monarch is the head of a state.
Your answer is "neither genuinely enlightened nor truly absolute"!
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps.
In aryan society, <span>People were divided into social groups based on occupation.
The group was divided into 4 strata, the highest one is for the people who held priest or academics as an occuppation, the 2nd highest is for government officials and warriors, the 3rd highest is for merchants and landowners , and the lowest is for the servants.
Yes, it change overtime, For example, priest no longer placed the highest within the social groups as scientific knowledge start to develop</span>
You didn't provide us with choices, so I'll simply provide some historical explanation. The main issue was whether the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights added.
The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states. Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA. They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.
Federalists believed the Constitution itself clearly limited government power and protected the rights of the people. Nevertheless, the addition of a Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided reassurance to Anti-Federalists in the fight over ratification. The compromise which led to agreement in regard to ratification of the Constitution was called the Massachusetts Compromise, because of major opposition to ratification that had existed in Massachusetts. John Hancock and Samuel Adams (both of them anti-Federalists) were the ones who helped negotiate the compromise. The anti-Federalists agreed that they would support ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that recommendations for amendments would follow if the Constitution was ratified. The Federalists promised to support the proposed amendments, which would outline a Bill of Rights to guarantee protection of specific rights the anti-Federalists wanted specifically asserted in the Constitution.
The US Constitution was ratified in 1788. The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.
Despite the original purpose of the articles of confederation, from its beginning the delegates were determined to address the issues of a weak central government.
<h3>The reasons for the revision of the article.</h3>
The reason why the article was to be revised was the fact that it lacked the ability to assign several powers to the federal government of the country.
This inability made the federal government unable to discharge some of its duties to the country.
Read more on the articles of confederation here:
brainly.com/question/13152253
According to a quick Google search, England. With the explorer Henry Hudson leading the expedition.
