A very sussy baka popping out of a coffin
<span>1.
</span>The main argument in this essay is that if the
audience does not accept the villain the poet (specifically Shakespeare here) writes,
then Shakespeare will become the villain of his own play.
<span>2.
</span>In lines 25-44 the author is supporting the
fact that the poet is completely at the mercy of his audience. Sometimes the
reception by the audience has nothing to do with the play itself, it might be
differences from audience to audience based on who is there and how they are
feeling on that particular night.
<span>
3. Shakespeare cannot give up revenge because it is what the audience wants.
The author says that “tragedy is revenge”. If he gives up revenge, he is giving
up his audience and therefore his entire basis of work. </span>
<span>
4. The author presents this information directly from the text because the
structure of the lines is as important as what they are saying. Hamlet presents
the images of his father and his uncle next to each other, and the meter of the
lines represents that back and forth of comparison by mirroring each other. “This
was your husband/Here is your husband”. The repetition with slight changes in
description show the contrast better than a summary could. </span>
<span>
5. The author says this is a “catchy example” because Hamlet needs to adopt the
same sense of grand military action towards Claudius for his revenge as Fortinbras
does for what seems like nothing. Hamlet needs, like Fortinbras, to be willing
to throw away everything for “an eggshell”. </span>
<span>
6. Laertes is like the actor that played Hecuba because he is able to turn on
his tears and emotions even if it contradicts what he is feeling inside. This similarity
suggests that Laertes cares more about the show of things, in the same way he
seems to care more about the ceremony surrounding Ophelia’s burial than her death
itself, than the things themselves. It shows that he is all for show rather
than sincerity. </span>
<span>
7. These lines relate to the author’s argument because it reinforces the idea
that the audience is actually in control of the play. It shows examples of
lines that represent the height of the trauma and tragedy, so that the audience
knows the ending is near. </span>
<span>
8. Gertrude refers to Hamlet’s outburst as “madness” and he refers to his own
outburst as “towering passion.” The differences here are in who the audience
chooses to believe. If the audience follows Gertrude’s lead by thinking he is
mad, they will receive the ending differently than if they trust Hamlet himself
that his outbursts are an outpouring of passion. </span>
Answer and Explanation:
Credibility is very important when choosing a source because if you select wrongly, you could be reporting/writing about false information.
First, look at who the author of the source is. Usually, if they are well-known authors or organizations (for example, the World Health Organization or the United Nations), this will be a good source to use.
Next, check out the date the article or source was written. If it was written recently, there's a higher probability that it will apply better and lend more credibility than if it was written 10 years ago.
When using websites, take a look at the URL. Those that end in .gov and .edu are usually relatively trustworthy because they are created by trusted organizations. However, if you have a website that ends in .com or .org, make sure you check what organization it is because they're not always credible.
Finally, look at who the author intends to write for. Is the audience a group of teachers? Or is the article targeted to young children? Research scientists? Whichever audience the article pertains to, if it doesn't relate to your thesis and research, I advise you not to use it.
Hope this helps!
Answer: right now jim is reading the newspaper and kathy is making dinner. last night at the same time, they (Do) 1)_______the same thing. she (cook) 2)______ and he (read) 3)__________the newspaper. tomorrow at this time, they (do,also) 4)_______the same thing. she (prepare) 5)__________dinner and he (read) 6)__________
explanation:
1) did
2) cooked
3) red
4) also did
5) prepared
6) the newspaper
21. Answer: b. Contrary
Explanation: Contrary means opposite. Valuing honesty is the opposite (or contrary) view compared to lying on a daily basis.
22. Answer: b. Justification
Explanation: The people would need provide an <em>explanation </em>as to<em> </em>why they value honesty if they cannot be honest themselves. The synonym for explanation is justification.
23. Answer: d. Empirical
Explanation: Empirical means studied through direct or indirect observation or experience. If information was collected during a study, it is considered an empirical study.
24. Answer: a. Revealed
Explanation: Studies were done on people telling "white lies", therefore they "revealed" or showed the results of the study.
25. Answer: c. Erode
Explanation: Erode means to gradually destroy, and the text explains that "white lies" slowly destroy one's self-image as an honest person.
