1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makkiz [27]
3 years ago
7

What innovation do you think has had the most influence on expanding the American economy? Why?

Social Studies
1 answer:
4vir4ik [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It is reasonable to argue that the <em>invention of the internet</em> had the most influence on expanding American economy.

Explanation:

<u>The internet </u>had a <u>significant effect on cost savings in many sectors of economy, that lowered the prices of products and services</u> and thus increasing living standards and economic growth. It also<u> increased management efficiency to manage companies supply chains more effectively, making transactions cheaper and quicker.</u>

For example, online retail had a revolutionary impact on American economy. Thanks to online retail companies, such as Amazon, shopping has become much faster and easier on the customers side. Customers no longer have to spend time going to the shop, they can make quick purchases online and get their order delivered to the doorstep. On the other hand, online retail companies do not need to rent shopping spaces anymore, they rather need to build super efficient fulfillment centers.

You might be interested in
Which cost element of the u.s. scheduled airlines accounts for the largest portion of operating costs?
Marysya12 [62]

The primary cost component for American scheduled airlines is fuel, which accounts for the majority of operational expenses.

<h3>What are fixed and variable costs for an airline?</h3>

In contrast to variable costs, which change over time, fixed expenses remain the same. Variable costs, which include things like fuel, oil, maintenance, landing fees, etc., on the other hand, are subject to change. The fixed costs do not change regardless of how much time you spend flying your aircraft.

<h3>What are aircraft direct operating costs?</h3>

The term "direct operating cost" (DOC) refers to expenses that are directly connected to running a flight, such as flight attendant pay, aircraft fuel and oil, lease rental or depreciation, maintenance costs, insurance premiums, ground handling, navigational fees, landing and parking fees, and in-flight catering services.

Learn more about operating cost: brainly.com/question/15699967

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
How markets work unit test economics
Paul [167]
Oh gosh oh wow wow i i
6 0
2 years ago
What is an organization, and how does a typical police agency constitute an organization? What are the key components of a basic
Maurinko [17]

Answer:

An organization is a group of like minds coming together to achieve a purpose

Explanation:

From the definition of an organization, there must be like minded people, and there must be a goal. The organization is now structured to achieved a particular purpose, it must have a head, the visionist and followers that share the same concept to achieve the same purpose.

Now relating to a police agency, a police agency is created for the purpose of policing, to keep law and other, that is the purpose of the organization(The agency), it must have like minded people to achieve this purpose of policing, without these set of people, they cant carry the act out.

The key components of a basic organization is the goal and vision, before we have the heads and the personnel, a basic organization has units divided to carry out different functions, that is why it called organization, yes there are people of the same mind set but different methods to achieve a goal, so the structure is created to accommodate these by creating units, heads and personnel. so a basic organization structure has units, heads and organization apart form the goals and aims.

3 0
3 years ago
The government of Kenya and South Africa could BOTH be described as A) republics. B) dictatorships. C) federal systems. D) confe
Law Incorporation [45]
I think it is A. I am probably wrong though
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Parents warn a new babysitter that their son, Dennis, is very aggressive and mischievous. As a result of this initial expectatio
    7·1 answer
  • Terry is making a multilayer wedding cake. While trying to make sure it does not collapse, he remembers a bridge he saw that had
    7·1 answer
  • _____ is an anxiety disorder in which the individual experiences recurrent, sudden onsets of intense terror, often without warni
    5·1 answer
  • Define learned helplessness
    12·1 answer
  • Everything else held​ constant, if the federal government were to guarantee today that it will pay creditors if a corporation go
    10·1 answer
  • 1. A period of social and economic change in China during the Cold War Era. *
    6·1 answer
  • How were Confucian ideas merged into shinto
    8·1 answer
  • 2-- Selecciona 5 de estos verbos conjugados y escribe un enunciado con cada uno d
    8·1 answer
  • Why does Ohio have more electors in the electoral college process than Virginia?
    13·1 answer
  • Discuss three contributing factors that led to Human rights violations on human trafficking​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!