How did the Japanese invasion afect the civil war in China

History

1 answer:

andriy [413]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The Japanese full invasion of China followed the fabricated incident of the Marco Polo bridge in Peking in 1937. The Japanese imperial army already occupied Manchuria, which was part of China. By then , the Nationalist government of Chiang Kai-shek and the guerrillas of the Chinese Communist Party had been fighting a civil war for almost a decade. With reluctancy and mutual distrust, both the Communists and the Nationalists joined forces to fight against the Japanese. The Communists mainly fought a guerrilla war behind the Japanese lines, and the Nationalists faced directly the advancing Japanese troops, suffering heavy losses and retreating to Chonqing. After the Japanese surrender of 1945, the civil war restarted.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

99 POINTS TO BRAINIEST ANSWER!!!

Cloud [144]

1370 INR would be the answer to the first one because 54.80 times 25 =1370

24.75 is the answer to the second one because 25 times .99 = 24.75

South Africa is the answer to the third one

i think that you should write the paragraph but in South Africa 1$ is equal to over 8$ whereas in the EU 1$ equals only .75$

2013 it would have been cheaper to buy tablets from India <span />

8 0

3 years ago

Please help with this

Serga [27]

Answer: he wanted a divorce with with Catherine of Aragon

Explanation : He wanted to divorce his wife, Catherine of Aragon, because she bore him no male heir and the pope wouldn't let him. ... Henry VIII divorced her b/c she didn't have sons.

7 0

3 years ago

What are two of the ancient Chinese dynasties? Select all that apply.

Sidana [21]

The answer is a. Ming and b . Shang

8 0

3 years ago

What was one goal of the Freedmans bureau

Katyanochek1 [597]

D to provide food, clothing and medical care to former slaves

4 0

3 years ago

Which claims about the declaration of the rights of man in the declaration of Independence are true the declaration of Independe

Juliette [100K]

True: The Declaration of Independence speaks of a Divine Creator.

True: The Declaration of the Rights of Man speaks of a Supreme Being.

True: Both documents drew on the natural law philosophy of John Locke.

Some additional details about the "Divine Creator" and "Supreme Being" distinction:

The Declaration of Independence (1776) famously asserted, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." America's founding fathers tended to speak in religious terms associated with the Christian tradition, even though a number of them were more like Deists in their own beliefs. Deists believe that there is a God who created the world, but set it up to run by natural laws and did not intervene in a personal way in its operation.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen (1789) was less overt in ascribing the rights of human beings to God as Creator. That declaration of the French Revolution stated, "The National Assembly recognizes and proclaims, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following rights of man and of the citizen." They were taking using more overtly Deist language, acknowledging a Supreme Being that was the reasonable force governing all things, but seeing human beings in society granting rights according to the actions of a just government.

7 0

3 years ago