I believe the correct answer is the following one - <span>Yes, since the mistake would be obvious to a reasonable person.
Anyone presiding over this case would see that the store had nothing to do with this, and that it isn't really a huge crime as it was obviously just a mistake. So, the store wouldn't be held liable for a small mistake that one of its employees made.
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is - learning.
Explanation:
In this case, therapist have used stimuli sight and touch to create a new response in Chase to treat the shoe fetish to ease his distress with the help of shock to induce the response.
Therapist also use exposure and response prevention technique of classical technique to develop a learning wher he placed Chase in the situation where he was exposed to the engage in social skills and have sexual pleasure without having urge to restore or touch shoe.
Both techniques are related to learning aprroch of tratment by Classical conditioning.
Answer:
Majority opinions.
Concurring opinion
Concurring in the judgment
Dissenting opinion.
Answer:
Correct answer is They wanted to remain loyal to the king.
Explanation:
First and last options are not correct because the colonist didn't wanted war and were trying to prevent any further conflict.
Second option is not correct as they didn't wanted to change Parliament, but someone who would represent their interests in the same.
Third option is correct as they wanted to show their allegiance to the king, but also asked him to take into consideration the problems that were tormenting them.
