Answer:
Upon completion of interviews, of course the interview is meant to provide some first hand information to the researcher for it to suite the four categories below.
Explanation:
- The information obtained first of all must fit the ideas of the researcher through, specific questions and interview. If the interview questions are made, geared towards the researchers ideas then it will be possible for the researcher to have some resemblance. looking for questions that are related and straight to the topic is a great idea.
- The appropriateness of of the topic is determined by the research questions. The person conducting a research must include relevant questions that are much relevant to the research questions. again sticking to the main topic is another fact related to appropriateness. The finish of planning of an interview is arrived at when the interview is complete.
- Completion of an interview means that a research is to take place as the preliminary stages are fulfilled. An interview provides the necessary data, and information that will be very essential in the research.
- After an interview, one will have all the required data, and information to add in the parts of a paper. The data derived from the interview has much significance as it will be included in the findings, adding more information to the research objective and conclusion.
Answer:
step by step instructions to pay for a war against Britain.
Explanation:
That was the problem faced in 1775
Answer for your first question:
- Separation of powers refers to each branch of government having their own distinct powers, while checks and balances refers to the ability of each branch to prevent another branch from becoming too powerful.
For your second question:
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8033338#readmore
<em>[Proper form on Brainly is to ask just one question per post.]</em>
<u>Explanation in regard to your first question:</u>
The "separation of powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory. The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu. (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.") He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.
Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall. The framers of the United States Constitution embedded the separation of powers into the plan for US government.
As noted by <em>The History Channel, </em> "In addition to this separation of powers, the framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power." Some examples of the checks and balances used would be:
- Congress (the Legislative Branch) controls the government's budget, so the Executive Branch needs Congress's support to fund any of its desired initiatives.
- The President nominates federal officials, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
- The President has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority to override his veto.
- The Supreme Court and other federal courts (the Judicial Branch of government) can rule that laws passed by Congress or executive orders by the President are unconstitutional, blocking their implementation.
Production of more food--the system allowed for more food to be produced which fed the workers in an industrial economy.
The 'four-field system' rotates crops between the 4 fields no longer needing to keep one empty because one of the crops would replenish the field with nutrients while the others take nutrients away from the fields. <span />
