1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena55 [62]
3 years ago
8

Adrian is writing an essay about "The Most Dangerous Game.” Which detail from the excerpt best supports his idea that Rainsford

is unchanged and still feels that the hunter is justified in killing the hunted?
A man, who had been hiding in the curtains of the bed, was standing there.

"Swam," said Rainsford. "I found it quicker than walking through the
jungle."

Rainsford did not smile. "I am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "Get ready, General Zaroff."

He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided.
English
2 answers:
White raven [17]3 years ago
5 0
<span>"Rainsford did not smile. "I am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "Get ready, General Zaroff."</span>
siniylev [52]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The detail from the excerpt that best supports his idea that Rainsford is unchanged and still feels that the hunter is justified in killing the hunted is:

* Rainsford did not smile. "I am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "Get ready, General Zaroff."

Explanation:

The question is not complete since it does not provide the excerpt, here is the excerpt:

Read the excerpt from "The Most Dangerous Game."

A man, who had been hiding in the curtains of the bed, was standing there.

"Rainsford!" screamed the general. "How in God's name did you get here?"

"Swam," said Rainsford. "I found it quicker than walking through the

jungle."

The general sucked in his breath and smiled. "I congratulate you," he said. "You have won the game."

Rainsford did not smile. "I am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "Get ready, General Zaroff."

The general made one of his deepest bows. "I see," he said. "Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford." . . .

He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided.

The story "The Most Dangerous Game " by Richard Connell tells the story of people trying to survive o a manhunter, here in this excerpt we can see how Rainsford after an extremely hard adventure continues thinking that the hunter has the right when he says "I am still a beast at bay," and "Get ready, General Zaroff.", he is ready to kill and so he does, right before going to bed.

You might be interested in
Can you guys read and answer 1 question, will mark brainliest
AleksandrR [38]

okay hold on, they wont let my answer go through so i'll post this and write it in the comments :)

7 0
3 years ago
What is the role of the leader in a group discussion?
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

A is the closest answer, My answer would be: Make sure everyone is focused and heard or included.

Explanation:

A. To introduce information for the group to discuss? Yes, This is very important, you are now firstly, getting everyone on track on what to do, and second, make sure to have everyone included

B. To help resolve conflicts during group discussions? Important but not really.

C. To take notes on the main points of discussion? again, Important but not really.

D. to track the time spent on the group discussion? That sounds like a minor job that a leader shouldn't do.

6 0
3 years ago
How might the narrator’s point of view affect the plot of a story?
Alborosie

Answer:

In literature, the turning point or climax is the point of highest tension in a narrative; it's the most exciting and revealing part of a story. It leads the rising action into the falling action before a story is resolved and reaches the conclusion.

Explanation:

Hope this Helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
3 years ago
Sentences with words dent and stash
sveta [45]
Sentences? How about this:

Hitting the tree put a dent in my car.
I found a stash of candy hidden under my brother's pillowcase.

Or if you need them both in one sentence:

I tried to get to the stash of food behind the metal door, but I could barely make a dent.

Is that what you needed?
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • For questions 1–4, identify the sentence in each group in which the underlined verb does NOT agree with its subject. A. Everyone
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements describe the last two lines of a Shakespearean sonnet?
    8·1 answer
  • What was one of Orwell’s inspirations for Animal Farm?
    10·2 answers
  • I need help with this question Which group of words best helps the reader understand the meaning of the word cumulative in this
    15·2 answers
  • Read the following sentences from the high school step team
    10·2 answers
  • How does King want advocates for equality to pursue
    11·1 answer
  • Drag each tile to the correct box.
    10·2 answers
  • Select the correct answers.
    14·2 answers
  • Hey should i cut my hair like this yes or no
    15·2 answers
  • What literary device is “things can go south in a hurry.”
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!