1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nesterboy [21]
3 years ago
13

When reinforcement follows a predetermined number of responses, it is a _____ schedule of reinforcement, compared to a _____ sch

edule in which reinforcement follows the first response after a predetermined period of time has elapsed.
Social Studies
1 answer:
PolarNik [594]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

fixed ratio, fixed interval

Explanation:

fixed ratio, fixed interval

fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement - in this reinforcement is delivered only when  number of responses is complete. The number of responses remains constant and it is written as FR with digit mentioning the required number of responses that are needed to obtain reinforcement.

fixed interval - in this scheduling of reinforcement is followed only after some allotted time has passed

You might be interested in
(please answer as soon as possible) Which of the following best describes the United States?
denis-greek [22]

Answer:

d i think

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Why did the colonists declare independence from England?
Drupady [299]
They wanted to be there own nation, not England’s
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of discrimination? a. refusing to sell someone a house because of his or her race b. believ
alexdok [17]

The correct answer is letter A.

Explanation: Discrimination occurs when someone adopts a prejudiced attitude (based on preconceived ideas) toward someone, whether it be racial, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, economic status or any other social aspect.

3 0
3 years ago
What ‘policy’ did the ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford put in place?
Ede4ka [16]
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.

In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.

During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
3 0
3 years ago
Today many Americans believe that our government must follow the same principles outline by the founders and no others how do yo
laila [671]

US nation witnessed many social and economic issues during Word War II. The then American president Roosevelt conveyed the four freedom of thought to the people with his sentimental policy focus on administration.  

Explanation:

After the drastic effects of World War II, US national citizens experienced the problem of unemployment, low standard of living, The Great Depression, and low production. But Roosevelt adopted many policies to recover the losses. He also propagated the power of defending critical issues.

Roosevelt had framed his ideology with the four freedom of principles namely worship, want, fear, and speech. He envisaged such principles directly to the people with their sentiment thought.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Psychology is not just a common sense study of behavior it must be an _____ study
    5·1 answer
  • Why do more people live in some places than others?
    8·1 answer
  • A good reason for overloading an operator is to enable it to ________. outperform its C language counterparts work in its usual
    9·2 answers
  • Dominique is shown a series of triangles of different sizes and colors and is asked to guess what the next triangle in the serie
    5·1 answer
  • Research has shown that in the modern multinational enterprise, core competencies and skills typically reside in the home countr
    6·1 answer
  • As you work with 3-year-old Effie, you keep track of all the new words she uses. You find that, on average, Effie uses two or th
    7·1 answer
  • Activity 3: Findings
    11·1 answer
  • Earthquakes are deadly. Every year thousands of people are killed or injured because of earthquakes. The most damage is usually
    6·1 answer
  • How did Confucianism change after its rebirth in 600 A.D.?
    9·2 answers
  • Based on the table what has been an impact of political parties on policy making
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!