Answer: The graph is attached.
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation of the line in Slope-Intercept form is:
Where "m" is the slope and "b" is the y-intercept.
Given the first equation:
You can identify that:
By definition, the line intersects the x-axis when 
. Then, subsituting this value into the equation and solving for "x", you get that the x-intercept is:
Now you can graph it.
Solve for "y" from the second equation:
You can identify that:
Notice that the slopes and the y-intercepts of the first line and the second line are equal; this means that they are exactly the same line and the System of equations has<u> Infinitely many solutions.</u>
See the graph attached.
That's very interesting. I had never thought about it before.
Let's look through all of the ten possible digits in that place,
and see what we can tell:
-- 0:
A number greater than 10 with a 0 in the units place is a multiple of
either 5 or 10, so it's not a prime number.
-- 1:
A number greater than 10 with a 1 in the units place could be
a prime (11, 31 etc.) but it doesn't have to be (21, 51).
-- 2:
A number greater than 10 with a 2 in the units place has 2 as a factor
(it's an even number), so it's not a prime number.
-- 3:
A number greater than 10 with a 3 in the units place could be
a prime (13, 23 etc.) but it doesn't have to be (33, 63) .
-- 4:
A number greater than 10 with a 4 in the units place is an even
number, and has 2 as a factor, so it's not a prime number.
-- 5:
A number greater than 10 with a 5 in the units place is a multiple
of either 5 or 10, so it's not a prime number.
-- 6:
A number greater than 10 with a 6 in the units place is an even
number, and has 2 as a factor, so it's not a prime number.
-- 7:
A number greater than 10 with a 7 in the units place could be
a prime (17, 37 etc.) but it doesn't have to be (27, 57) .
-- 8:
A number greater than 10 with a 8 in the units place is an even
number, and has 2 as a factor, so it's not a prime number.
-- 9:
A number greater than 10 with a 9 in the units place could be
a prime (19, 29 etc.) but it doesn't have to be (39, 69) .
So a number greater than 10 that IS a prime number COULD have
any of the digits 1, 3, 7, or 9 in its units place.
It CAN't have a 0, 2, 4, 5, 6, or 8 .
The only choice that includes all of the possibilities is 'A' .
Answer:
B
C
F
D
H
A
G
E
Step-by-step explanation:
Ok. They are trying to reconstruct the smaller looking triangle in the bigger triangle using angle A as the common angle.
The first statement is always the given.
Second they constructed line segment XY into the bigger triangle so that XY is parallel to BC.
Third, from the construction of the parallel lines we can now find corresponding angles that are congruent. This would be the use of F.
Since we have all three angles in triangle AXY and triangle ABC, then the construction of the smaller triangle we made inside the bigger triangle is similar to the bigger triangle. So we have the triangles are similar. You could say E or D here in my opinion. This is choice D.
Fifth the creation of those fractions of sides being equal comes from us knowing the corresponding sides of similar triangles are proportional. This is choice H.
Things looked cut off for the sixth thing so I can't fully read it, but it is possible a substitution has occured.
The seventh thing is a congruence statement which can be proven by a congruence postulate. The only one listed is SAS. So that is G.
The last thing, since the triangle construction is congruent to the smaller triangle then we know the smaller triangle is also similar to the bigger triangle since the bigger one is also similar to the construction we made. I really think E and D is interchangeable. Choice E goes here.
Answer:
dot
Step-by-step explanation:
