1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
7

What is the main idea of Carroll v. United States? Why is the the idea important to the DLK case?

History
2 answers:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
8 0

The main idea of <em>Carrol v. United States</em> is that automobiles can be subject to warrantless searches because they constitute an exception to the principles of a search with a warrant since they are <u>mobile</u> and by the time a search warrant can be obtained from a judge they will easily be removed from the territorial jurisdiction of the locality where the warrant was issued, actively rendering it meaningless. This is known as the automobile exception.

In the Kyllo v. United States case, the suspect was thought by the police to be growing marijuana in his home. Therefore, the police decided to use thermal imaging to scan it (since marijuana plants require very hot ultraviolet lights to grow). Their findings gave them probable cause (a reason to believe that a crime is being committed). However, after this case was brought to the Supreme Court of the US, they considered that using such modern technology infringed the right of privacy of the defendant, as such imaging allows for a view of what is happening inside the home. Since a home is not <u>mobile </u>it was perfectly possible for the police officers to get a warrant to perform such thermal search and thus the warrantless search was unlawful.


sveticcg [70]3 years ago
5 0

Carroll v. US main idea is to permit a warrantless search of a car in the presence of a probable cause, attending to the fact that the vehicle can be removed from the area before a search warrant is obtained.

At DLK case the big discussion is if the Fourth Amendment has any exceptions in the case of search warrants, because we are talking again about a case that evolves the concept of “searching” itself  in light of new technologic developments.

At DLK case the decission that thermal imaging of a home doesn’t constitute a search is a strong  legal precedent to argument that if in the future thecnology can create sophisticated equipements to invade one’s right to privacy, the fourth amendment can still protect citizens against them.


You might be interested in
Which term describes this type of diplomacy, which was used specifically to describe American actions during Panama's revolution
umka2103 [35]

Answer: Gunboat Diplomacy.

Explanation: This is when a nation uses the threat of force or conspicuous displays of firepower to have influence in foreign policy, and it's called "Gunboat Diplomacy". The president Roosevelt used this tactic as a way to secure Panama's independence from Colombia; in a way of exchange the United States was able to secure access to what would become the Panama Canal.

Hope this helps.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the above passage included in the Bill of Rights?
Strike441 [17]

The correct answer is A. To explain why rights were being reserved for citizens rather than the government.


Indeed, the context of the Bill of Rights was that the articles of Confederation that were used to regulate relations between the states were insufficient as the federal government that was supposed to enforce them was actually weakened by them. The Philadelphia Convention was organized to fix these articles but it was finally decided that they would be replaced with the Constitution. However, the great fear of Anti-Federalists was that such Constitution would give too much power to the President and thus it had to be counterbalanced by strong Individual rights for American Citizens. Thus, this particular Fifth Amendment was intended to establish several constitutional rights and judicial protections for American citizens such as:


- The Right to be judged by a Grand Jury of one’s peers.

- The Infamous crime clause.

- The Double Jeopardy Clause (right not to be tried twice for the same offense).

- The Right not to be forced self-incriminate legally.

- The Due Process Clause (right not to be arrested, prosecuted or incarcerated without valid legal justification and trial).

- The Takings Clause (the right not to be dispossessed of one’s property arbitrarily or without proper monetary compensation).


3 0
3 years ago
In matters of foreign policy, which of these are state governments NOT allowed to do? A) export goods to china. B) initiate a wa
steposvetlana [31]
The correct answer is C Initiate a war with Iraq.

States within the US have the ability export and import goods from other countries. However, states are not allowed to declare war on other countries. This result to declare war is reserved to the US Congress, as established in the United States Constitution.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 9 (1 point)
maxonik [38]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

..................

.......

7 0
2 years ago
Early Rome was ruled by the<br> Franciscans<br> Assyrians<br> Crustaceans<br> Etruscans
yarga [219]
He is correct . Nice nice nice
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The idea of laissez faire in president hoovers 1932 campaign platform was that
    13·1 answer
  • 20 points because I'm feeling generous!
    14·1 answer
  • Japan seized Manchuria and North China because ???
    14·1 answer
  • Credit recovery please help
    7·1 answer
  • Which is not an accurate definition for history? A. an account of the impact of human behavior on the environment B. the story o
    8·2 answers
  • Evaluate how the shirtwaist contributed to the labor union movement.
    9·1 answer
  • 5. Colonies would serve as potential markets. Immense wealth allowed Westem
    11·2 answers
  • All of the following are true statements about the men who joined the CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps) except
    14·2 answers
  • 1. What new war technologies were used in WW1?
    10·1 answer
  • When the Romans conquered people how did the Romans generally treat those religions
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!