Answer:
There is no question showing up so I dont know how to help u
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
6 : 45 = 2 : 15
Step-by-step explanation:
2/15 or 2:15
Answer:
2. The change in expected height for every one additional centimeter of femur length.
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>1. The expected height for someone with a femur length of 65 centimeters.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, that would be height value when centimeters = 65.</em>
<u>2</u><u><em>. </em></u><u>The change in expected height for every one additional centimeter of femur length.</u>
<em>Makes sense, for every increase in one additional centimeter, we can expect the height to be proportional to the slope.</em>
<u>3. The femur length for someone with an expected height of 2.5 centimeters.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, the linear relationship relies on the femur length to get the height.</em>
<u>4. The change in expected femur length for every one additional centimeter of height.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, again, the linear relationship relies on the femur length.</em>
1) A(-5,-3); B(-6,-1); C(-3,-1) ; D(-2,-3)
When a refection is done about x-axis, the values of the abscise x remain identical & the value of ordinate just change their signs:
A(-5,-3); A'(-5,+3)
B(-6,-1); B'(-6,+1)
C(-3,-1); C'(-3,+1)
D(-2,-3); D'(-2,+3)
2) A'B'C'D' is translated 3 UNITS RIGHT, that means the ordinated of A'B'C'D'
are the same but the abscises have been increased by 3 UNITS ;
A'(-5,+3) ==>A"(-2,3)
B'(-6,+1) ==>B"(-3,1)
C'(-3,+1) ==>C"(0,1)
D'(-2,+3) ==>D"(1,3)
