Answer:
Mrs. White does not believe in its powers and makes a humorous comment to her husband about wishing upon the talisman. Tragically, Mr. White wishes for two hundred pounds, and Herbert dies in a work accident the next day.
Explanation:
when the husband wished for unnessesary money there so ended up dead
 
        
             
        
        
        
<span>A horizontal relationship is one on which all the people involved in the relationship are considered to be on the same level and there is reciprocity of actions and expectations. This is reflected in option B because if responsibility is being distributed, then a mutual level of competence is being accepted.</span>
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
yes, because she's recording it without her dad's consent. her dad might not want her to show it to anyone. confronting her before anything gets out of hand is the best thing to do.
Explanation:
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
The prefix in the word inadmissible is -in.
I hope this helps you. ☺
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
the one the question is refering to.
The writing 'rule' (myth) Churchill's reply satirizes is the 'Never end a sentence on a preposition' rule (i.g. as I intetionally did on the immediate sentence before this one). And his reply to it was something like 'This is the type of errant pedantry up with which I will not put.'
The 'rule' is a myth, yes, but of course what Churchill did was an exaggeration to sneeringly point out the ignorance of those who criticized him.
His sentence therefore was incorrect. One possible change to improve it could be: 'This is the type of errant pedantry which I will not put up with.'
Specially the 'up' and 'with' of 'put up with' could never go in the middle of a sentence, as 'put up with' is a phrasal verb, meaning the verb and the preposition must always be together in the correct order.
I was able to find some possible variations of what his sentence could have actually had been, but in none of them the 'up with' goes along with 'put', so either ways we can assume that his sentence was deliberately wrong.
Explanation:
brainly