<em>There is no place for a convert in Hindu society, which is made up of castes, each of which is a closed corporation. As a result, the caste system has hindered Hindus from growing and absorbing other religious groups. Evangelism was not a priority for Hinduism and Judaism in the past. Both of these religions are more culturally and ethnically based. The missionary enthusiasm was missing, just as it was in Europe's pagan faiths and China's religions. Nothing in the holy writings makes it the followers' responsibility to disseminate the faith.</em>
<em></em>
<em>I hope this helps.</em>
<em></em>
<em>Consider marking as "Brainliest." </em>
<em></em>
<em>Stay Safe </em>
<em></em>
<em>- Robert</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
I'm thinking chocolate since I'm pretty sure lots of people rationed sugar during WWII. I don't think they would have rationed weapons, automobiles or water. Hope that helps.
Answer:
<h2>Hi mate PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE </h2>
Explanation:
The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached by the state delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.
Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise
At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, but the issue of slavery was a sticking point between the South and the North.
It benefitted Southern states to include enslaved people in their population counts, as that calculation would give them more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more political power. Delegates from Northern states, however, objected on the grounds that enslaved people could not vote, own property, or take advantage of the privileges that White men enjoyed. (None of the lawmakers called for the end of slavery, but some of the representatives did express their discomfort with it. George MAS on of VIRG inia called for anti-slave trade laws, and Gouverneur Morris of New York called slavery “a nefarious institution.”)
Ultimately, the delegates who objected to enslavement as an institution ignored their moral QUAL-ms in favor of unifying the states, thus leading to the creation of the three-fifths compromise.
... Can we get the descriptions?
Answer:
Explanation: March 1, 1994
