1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saveliy_v [14]
3 years ago
12

Why did the rosenburg case attract nationwide attention and controversy

History
2 answers:
kirill [66]3 years ago
7 0

Gradpiont!

The case against Julius and Ethel Rosenberg was based largely on the word of one confessed spy.

Anna [14]3 years ago
5 0

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were American citizens who spied on the United States on behalf of the USSR, giving confidential information about jets, radar, and more.

This attracted much attention as the United States was in the midst of a "red scare" where everyone was afraid of communist infiltration. The Rosenbergs gave tangible proof that the USSR was in fact infiltrating the USA.

You might be interested in
If you were a government official of a colonial power, which method of management would you prefer and why?
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

Just start of by thinking of all the methods of management power, write it down, then write what they are and do, whitch one can your relate to, and why can you relate to it. thats your real anser.

5 0
3 years ago
What actually happened in the St. Valentine's Day Massacre?
Mariana [72]
The Saint Valentine's Day Massacre is the name given to the death of seven people as part of a Prohibition Era conflict between two powerful criminal gangs in Chicago, Illinois, in the summer of 1929: the South Side Italian gang led by Al Capone and the North Side Irish gang led by Bugs Moran
6 0
3 years ago
Why was The Prince written​
Natali [406]

One of the goals in writing the prince was to win the favor of Lorenzo de Medici

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did France contributions help the Americans in the war of independence
mina [271]

Answer:

they help provide supplies such as gun&clothing to the army most importantly troops and naval support which made france became the official Ally of the US in 1778 through a treaty

5 0
4 years ago
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was aryan society structured? how did this social hierarchy change over time?
    14·1 answer
  • What were citizens of the polis expected to do?
    9·1 answer
  • Why were Americans interests nearly identical to those of Latin American nations ?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did neolithic people trade
    8·1 answer
  • How would African-Americans Influence Northern life?
    11·1 answer
  • The language of Anna's country has a Turkish influence. Where does Anna live? A. Ukraine B. Azerbaijan C. Belarus D. Russia
    13·2 answers
  • What were the results of The Great Leap Forward?
    10·2 answers
  • HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS IN UR OWN WORDS!!!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • What's the difference between Civil Rights Movement and Black Lives Matter? (This is for my history project!)
    12·1 answer
  • Which type of shelter did the Eastern Woodlands tribe live in?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!